Cultural Nuances in Work Attitudes and Behaviors: Towards a Model of African Work Culture

Abstract

This study explored managers’ perception of the work behaviors and attitudes of Nigerian workers with reference to Nigeria’s cultural orientation and the global culture. It compared Japan, USA and Nigeria on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, work culture and organizational outcomes. Descriptive survey design and purposive sampling technique were used in data collection. A total of 131 managers (74 males and 57 females) from manufacturing organizations in Ota, Ogun State were interviewed. The structured interview comprised of 12 statements on work attitudes and behaviors to which respondents agreed or disagreed and made remarks. Four research questions were asked and answered using frequency distribution. The result showed that greater percentage of managers perceived Nigerian workers to require close supervision, sanctions and coercion in driving compliance with organizational rules. Workers were also perceived to be motivated mostly by pay, rewards and benefits. However, only about half of the respondents agreed that Nigerian workers are self-centered and individualistic. Lastly, they perceived that given the right circumstances, Nigerian workers are highly resourceful and capable of participative decision-making and mutual responsibility. This study concluded that Nigeria as well as Japan have collectivist cultures while America has individualistic culture. Although collectivism has paid off as evinced in the successes of Japanese companies, Nigerian organizations, like many others in Africa, have been victims of acculturation with adverse consequences for organizational growth. Hence, a model of African work culture was recommended, one that should not jettison indigenous cultures, but ensure an effective blend with global best practices.
 
 Received: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 November 2020 / Published: 5 March 2021

Distinct leadership styles and differential effectiveness across culture: An analysis of South African business leaders

“…Uncertainty avoidance reflects the extent to which people in a society try to avoid situations that do not provide certainty; the masculinity-femininity dimension reflects how societies distribute roles based on gender; the individualism-collectivism dimension describes the extent to which individuals in a society are either integrated into groups or encouraged to be independent; long-term orientation refers to the extent to which a community or society embrace long-term and futuristic commitments, as opposed to commitments that are shortterm focused, thereby differentiating societies that are able to embrace change more rapidly than the others. Although Hofstede's framework has been challenged for various reasons, including the validity and representativeness of his data (Baskerville, 2003;Javidan, House, Dorfman, Hanges, & De Luque, 2006;, his work continues to be referenced to this day (Areiqata et al, 2021;Gallego-Álvarez & Pucheta-Martínez, 2021;Kaasa, 2021;Olatunji, Makhosazana, & Vezi-Magigaba, 2021;Olowookere, Agoha, Omonijo, Odukoya, & Elegbeleye, 2021). The various disciplines that reference his work include cross-cultural management (Beugelsdijk, Kostova, Kunst, Spadafora, & Van Essen, 2018;Klasing, 2013), country-level culture (Beugelsdijk, Kostova, & Roth, 2017) and international business (Kirkman, Lowe, & Gibson, 2006).…”

Transactional Leadership, Effective Commitment, and Workplace Deviance: Does Onboarding Experience Moderate the Relationship? Evidence from Nigeria

“…However, it is crucial to do empirical research to identify a suitable leadership style to address the issue of deviant behaviours among academics, given the worrisome rise in misbehaviour among Nigerian academics (Adeoti et al, 2021). Coincidentally, according to a recent study, Nigerian workers are primarily motivated by reward and punishment (Olowookere et al, 2021), hence, contingent reward leadership behaviour seems to be an appropriate concept to study in the Nigerian context. This finding, therefore, adds TL as one important antecedent of WD.…”

“…(Amin et al, 2018a;Erinosho et al, 2021;Olufemi, 2020), is an indication that something is fundamentally wrong with the leadership style and employee orientation in that context (Hendricks & Louw-Potgieter, 2012;Zheng et al, 2020). We draw from the literature's seeming negligible attention to the leadership-WD relationship in Nigeria, and the recent research findings that suggest that positive stimulus (reward) and negative reinforcement (punishment) have a significant relationship with employee behaviour in Nigeria (Olowookere et al, 2021), to investigate the impact of leader reward and punishment behaviour known as transactional leadership (Bass & Bass) on the WD. Furthermore, previous studies linking employee misbehaviour with leadership style (Amin et al, 2018a;Zheng et al, 2020) have typically failed to look into the interaction of other variables, such as employee commitment and his first experiences in the workplace.…”

South African MNCs’ HRM Systems and Practices at the Subsidiary Level: Insights From Subsidiaries in Nigeria

“…Scholars stress that the smaller the national cultural distance, the more comfortable the transfer of HRM practices from home companies to foreign subsidiaries. National cultural distance has been widely analysed in IHRM literature (Ayentimi et al 2018a;Olowookere et al 2021). Therefore, it is challenging to transfer some HRM practices between countries with varied national cultures (Al-Sarayrah et al 2016;Ogunsegha, 2013;Thomas & Peterson, 2017;Zhou et al 2020).…”

“…Accordingly, an organisation can also take the place of a family by providing purpose, security and identity. Olowookere et al (2021) suggested that individualism was associated with a lack of generosity and caring. Individuals are seen as alienated from their culture, traditions, and each other in the Sub-Saharan African context.…”