2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9603-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Orientation and Attitudes Toward Different Forms of Whistleblowing: A Comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U.K.

Abstract: cultural orientation, nationality, whistleblowing,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
199
0
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
199
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al (2008) could find no direct link between culture and whistleblowing tendency. Nevertheless, they emphasized the necessity to examine the relationship between culture and intention to whistleblowing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Park et al (2008) could find no direct link between culture and whistleblowing tendency. Nevertheless, they emphasized the necessity to examine the relationship between culture and intention to whistleblowing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A whistleblower releases information intentionally, and goes to third parties out of the organization to make the disclosure, when internal disclosure channels have failed in the organization (Liyanarachchi & Newdick, 2009). Park et al (2008) developed a typology of whistleblowing based on the channels used by the whistleblower for reporting the wrongdoing. According to the typology, whistleblowing in the identified mode refers to using real names during reporting the wrongdoing.…”
Section: Whistleblowingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some contexts remaining silent can carry as much or more of a message as speaking-up (Brinsfield, 2014;Cullinane & Donaghey, 2014) while research has also explored how a culture of corporate silence can be broken through whistle blowing, which occurs when silence is broken in order to draw attention to illegal or immoral organizational practices (Knoll & van Dick, 2013;Park, Blenkinsopp, Oktem & Omurgonulsen, 2007;Park & Blenkinsopp, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%