1987
DOI: 10.1177/019251218700800401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Premises, Political Structures and Dynamics

Abstract: Using the typical early pre-colonial African state as well as the Byzantine and Chinese empires as examples, the authors argue that the proper understanding of the state and, more generally, of political institutions and processes, requires that political actors and actions be studied in the context of the culture of which they are a part. The three case studies provided show that the impact of cultural factors on political processes, specifically the impact of a society's fundamental cultural premises, or wha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Eisenstadt was never crystal clear in positing a single theory of evolution, we can look at two clues to best understand what he thought evolved. First, the bulk of Eisenstadt's historical research was focused on two specific epochs and processes: the evolution of political autonomy in agrarian states beginning some 5000 years ago (Eisenstadt, 1963(Eisenstadt, , 1977Eisenstadt et al, 1987) and the emergence of religious entrepreneurs (Eisenstadt, 1980(Eisenstadt, , 1982(Eisenstadt, , 1986(Eisenstadt, , 1990 during the so-called Axial Age (ca. 800-200).…”
Section: Polity Religion and The Question Of What Evolvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Eisenstadt was never crystal clear in positing a single theory of evolution, we can look at two clues to best understand what he thought evolved. First, the bulk of Eisenstadt's historical research was focused on two specific epochs and processes: the evolution of political autonomy in agrarian states beginning some 5000 years ago (Eisenstadt, 1963(Eisenstadt, , 1977Eisenstadt et al, 1987) and the emergence of religious entrepreneurs (Eisenstadt, 1980(Eisenstadt, , 1982(Eisenstadt, , 1986(Eisenstadt, , 1990 during the so-called Axial Age (ca. 800-200).…”
Section: Polity Religion and The Question Of What Evolvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, it was his later interests (e.g. Eisenstadt, 1986Eisenstadt, , 2000Eisenstadt et al, 1987), what he termed "multiple modernities," that have deservingly received much attention (Alexander, 1992;Alexander and Colomy, 1990;Joas, 2012;Wittrock, 2005). In the article, we argue that his earliest work on sociocultural evolution (Eisenstadt, 1963(Eisenstadt, , 1964(Eisenstadt, , 1965(Eisenstadt, , 1971) deserves a renewed focus, especially in light of the recent advances made in neo-evolutionary theory (Machalek and Martin, 2016) and the growing integration of cognitive and evolutionary psychology into sociology (Norenzayan, 2013;Slingerland et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%