Cultural sense-making integration into risk mitigation strategies towards megaproject success

Abstract

This is a repository copy of Cultural sense-making integration into risk mitigation strategies towards megaproject success.

Anlamlandirma Teori̇si̇ Ve Anlamlandirma Ölçeği̇ Geli̇şti̇rme Çalişmasi: Bi̇reyleri̇n Çevreleri̇ndeki̇ Davranişlari, Olaylari, İşaretleri̇ Ve Farkliliklari Anlamlandirma Durumlari

“…Literatürde anlamlandırma kavramıyla ilgili çeşitli örgütsel konuların incelendiği görülmektedir. Güncel literatürde farklı disiplinlerde de olmak üzere; kültürel anlamlandırma entegrasyonu (Dyer, 2017), örgütsel ayarların adaptasyonu için anlamlandırma süreci (Ito ve Inohara, 2015), uluslararası işlerde anlamlandırma (Jakobsen, Worm ve Li, 2018), gelişen piyasalarda anlamlandırma (Kharchenkova, 2018), biliş, eylem ve çıktılar arasında iş piyasalarında anlamlandırma (Mattsson, Corsaro ve Ramos, 2015), stratejik yönetim muhasebesi ve anlamlandırma (Tillmann ve Goddard, 2008), finansal krizler ve anlamlandırma (Tuğsal, 2015), iş yaşamında duyguları anlamlandırma (Tuğsal, 2016), kriz iletişimi ve anlamlandırma (Xu, 2018) üzerine çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Fakat anlamlandırma ile ilgili literatürde birçok araştırma olmasına rağmen; erişilebilen Türkçe ve İngilizce kaynaklarda anlamlandırma ölçeği ile ilgili bir çalışmaya rastlanmadığı ve literatürde doldurulması gereken önemli bir boşluk olduğu fark edilmiştir.…”

Inter-organisational project network integration: a systematic literature review

“…Stakeholder analysis and risk management were proposed to be integrated trough extended power-interest-matrix (Demir et al, 2015). An alternative standpoint of megaproject risk management, managing stakeholder cultural aspects and social responsibilities, and integrating this aspect to the risk management process, was introduced in the literature (Dyer, 2017).…”

“…improving project outcomes, collaboration through partnering and barriers to collaboration, collaboration with external users key to service innovations, trust, collaborative practices, BIM as a integration, characteristics of and cornerstones for developing integrated teams, managerial practices leading to full or partial team integration or fragmentation, key indicators for the success of integrated teams, framework for influencing the indicators Single case study, multiple case study, surveys and interviews Construction Buvik and Rolfsen (2015), Khairil et al (2015), Aapaoja et al (2013), Baiden et al (2006) and Baiden and Price (2011) 1.4 Process and knowledge integration Knowledge integration enablers and activities, learning in project context, social capital, integrating IT systems to provide better support for business processes, integration of existing software applications through unified processes and tools, stakeholder integration process and management, integration of risk management practices and processes between sites, integration of risk management related to collaboration, integrating risk management practices and processes to other project management processes, integrating the stakeholder management to the risk management process, integration of design, construction, and operations phases of a project, ), Fuller et al (2011), Ratcheva (2009), Bony (2010), Di Vincenzo and Mascia (2012), Ndoni and Elhag(2010),Yang et al (2006),Austin et al (2002),Dyer (2017),Kamara et al (2001),Kleiss and Imura (2006),Currie (2003),Wagner et al (2017),Arashpour et al (2017),Salaka and Prabhu (2008),Demir et al (2015),Rajablu et al (2017),Yeo et al (2016) and Arashpour et al a structure and a process of coping with the complexity, managerial approaches and common practices in managing the complexity, understanding and managing the social aspect of systems integration: ,Caron et al (2016),Wang et al (2007) and…”

Translation, Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of the Sense-Making Scale: A Cross-Cultural Evidence From India, Malaysia, Romania and Turkey

“…It is seen that various organizational issues related to the concept of sense-making are examined. In the current literature, including in different disciplines; integration of cultural sense-making (Dyer, 2017), the process of sense-making for adaptation of organizational settings (Ito and Inohara, 2015), sense-making in international affairs (Jakobsen, Worm & Li, 2018), sensemaking in developing markets (Kharchenkova, 2018), cognition, action and outputs (Mattsson, Corsaro & Ramos, 2015), strategic management accounting and sense-making (Tillmann & Goddard, 2008), financial crises and sense-making (Tuğsal, 2015), sense-making in business life (Tuğsal, 2016), crisis communication and sense-making (Xu, 2018). On the contrary, although there is a lot of research about sense-making in the existing literature; there is not any sense-making scale in English in social sciences and there is a significant gap to be filled.…”