2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and incongruity in The Office (UK)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Watson (2015, p. 409) notes that ‘as a field of study, humour has been subject to considerable scrutiny’, leading to a number of overlapping and complementary theories as to its function. These include incongruity (de Jongste, 2017), superiority (Mulkay, 1988), relief (Rodrigues & Collinson, 1995), ridicule (Billig, 2005) and dramaturgy (Ybema & Horvers, 2017). It is widely recognized that forms of humour are present in most conversations (Fox, 2004) and help people understand what is salient (Watson, 2015).…”
Section: Humourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watson (2015, p. 409) notes that ‘as a field of study, humour has been subject to considerable scrutiny’, leading to a number of overlapping and complementary theories as to its function. These include incongruity (de Jongste, 2017), superiority (Mulkay, 1988), relief (Rodrigues & Collinson, 1995), ridicule (Billig, 2005) and dramaturgy (Ybema & Horvers, 2017). It is widely recognized that forms of humour are present in most conversations (Fox, 2004) and help people understand what is salient (Watson, 2015).…”
Section: Humourmentioning
confidence: 99%