“…Although heart valve culture remains part of the Duke classification scheme for the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis, its poor sensitivity (7.8-25.4%) and specificity (71.6-88.6%) has led several investigators to recommend that culture testing be replaced by broad-range PCR as a major diagnostic criterion because of its much higher sensitivity (range = 41.2-96%) and specificity (95-100%). Several studies have documented the reliability of broadrange PCR for the detection of bacteria in excised heart valves and this assay is being increasingly used in conjunction with blood cultures to determine the microbial aetiology in both blood culture-positive and -negative endocarditis cases Moore et al, 2001;Bosshard et al, 2003b;Lepidi et al, 2003Lepidi et al, , 2004Breitkopf et al, 2005;Greub et al, 2005;Houpikian and Raoult, 2005;Raoult et al, 2005;Rice and Madico, 2005;Rovery et al, 2005;Marin et al, 2007;Dreier et al, 2008;Munoz et al, 2008;Voldstedlund et al, 2008;Tang, 2009;Fournier et al, 2010;Caram et al, 2008). Broad-range 16S rDNA gene PCR on heart valve tissue allows diagnosis of unusual causative agents of culture-negative endocarditis including Cardiobacterium hominis (Mueller et al, 1999), Bartonella quintana (Houpikian and Raoult, 2005;Dreier et al, 2008), Tropheryma whipplei ( Interpretation of all broad-range PCR results should be correlated with the clinical picture due to the potential for DNA contamination from other sources.…”