Cumulative Childhood Adversity as a Risk Factor for Common Chronic Pain Conditions in Young Adults

You, Dokyoung S.; Albu, Sergiu; Lisenbardt, Hans; Meagher, Mary W.

doi:10.1093/pm/pny106

Cited by 86 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A clinical implication of the environmental covariation is that some early‐life adversities (You, Albu, Lisenbardt, & Meagher, 2018) could increase liability to both anxiety and pain. Preclinical, genetically‐informed models of co‐occurring anxiety, pain, and early‐life adversities are beginning to provide leads about etiological mechanisms including gene‐environment interplay (Cittaro et al, 2016; Giannese et al, 2018), and new somatic treatments (Battaglia, Rossignol, Bachand, D'Amato, & De Koninck, 2019) that may constitute alternatives to current conceptualizations and treatments.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trajectories of pain and anxiety in a longitudinal cohort of adolescent twins

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trajectories of pain and anxiety in a longitudinal cohort of adolescent twins

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Migraine is one of eight disorders that affect over 10% of the world population [1]. It is one of the most common chronic pain conditions among the young adult population [2], with prevalence peaking between 20 and 30 years of age. Women [3] and students are some of the populations most widely affected by migraine [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Spanish version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in university students with migraine

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire is widely used to determine the degree of migraine-related disability of subjects. So far, and to the best of our knowledge, no Spanish version of this tool has been validated. The questionnaire comprises seven items, with the first five constituting the main scale while the sixth and seventh items referring, respectively, to the frequency and intensity of headache. The present study aims to analyze the clinimetric properties of the Spanish version of the MIDAS questionnaire in a population of university students. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of validation for this measuring instrument. A total of 153 subjects participated in the study. We analyzed construct validity using factor analysis, test-retest reliability by the Intraclass Correlation Coeficient (ICC), internal consistency, and concurrent validity with respect to the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results: Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure. The questionnaire has good reliability for the MIDAS mainscale score ([ICC = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.63-0.90]), excellent reliability for headache frequency (ICC = 0.90; 95%; CI: [0.79-0.95]), and moderately good reliability for headache intensity (ICC = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.34-0.80]). The analysis also yielded good internal consistency results (α Cronbach = 0.797) and a moderate correlation between MIDAS-main scale and the physical component summary of SF-12 (Rho = − 0.326; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Spanish version of the MIDAS questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool to measure migrainerelated disability in university subjects. The two additional items provide information that could help clinicians in making decisions.

show abstract

“…Migraine is one of the eight disorders that affect more than 10% of the world population [1]. It is one of the most common chronic pain condition among the young adult population [2], with prevalence peaked between 20-30 years old. Additionally, women [3] and students are some of the populations most affected by migraine [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Spanish version of Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in migraine university students.

Rodríguez-Almagro

Achalandabaso‐Ochoa

Rus

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire is widely used for determining headache-related disability. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no validated Spanish version of the questionnaire. It is composed of seven items; the first five items constitute the main scale, while the sixth and seventh items refer respectively to the frequency and intensity of headache. The present study is aimed at analyzing the clinimetric properties of the Spanish version of the MIDAS questionnaire in a population of university students.Methods. We performed a cross-sectional study of validation of measuring instruments. One hundred fifty-three subjects participated in the study. We analyzed construct validity by factor analysis, test-retest reliability by the Intraclass Correlation Coeficient (ICC), internal consistency, and concurrent validity with respect to the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12).Results. Factor analysis showed a two factors structure composed. The questionnaire presented good reliability for the MIDAS-main scale score ([ICC = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.63 – 0.90]), excellent reliability for headache frequency (ICC = 0.90; 95%; CI: [0.79 – 0.95]), and moderate reliability for headache intensity (ICC = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.34 – 0.80]). The analysis also showed good internal consistency results (α Cronbach = 0.797) and a moderate correlation between MIDAS-main scale and physical summary component of SF-12 (Rho = -0.326; p < 0.001).Conclusions. The Spanish version of the MIDAS questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool to measure headache-related disability in university subjects. The two additional items provide information that could help clinicians in making decisions.

show abstract

Cumulative Childhood Adversity as a Risk Factor for Common Chronic Pain Conditions in Young Adults

Abstract: Cumulative childhood adverse events may be a more relevant risk factor for chronic pain conditions than the experience of a specific type of adverse event. Clinicians and researchers need to evaluate cumulative childhood adversity when assessing its link to chronic pain.

Cited by 86 publications

References 32 publications

Trajectories of pain and anxiety in a longitudinal cohort of adolescent twins

Trajectories of pain and anxiety in a longitudinal cohort of adolescent twins

Validation of the Spanish version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in university students with migraine

Validation of the Spanish version of Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in migraine university students.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About