2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000164027.06880.3a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cup Alignment Error Model for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2.5D US was first introduced in CAOS to register pre-operative vertebral CT images to the patient coordinate system in computer-assisted spinal surgery (7). This method was also applied to the registration of pre-operative pelvic CT images for percutaneous sacroiliac screwing (14) and for implant positioning in THA (15,16). The basic idea is that the US probe acts like a transcutaneous digitizing probe, by using 'specular reflection' on bone surfaces (the echo time in a given area is near to proportional to the distance between the transducer and the bone surface).…”
Section: Description Of the Echo Surgetics Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.5D US was first introduced in CAOS to register pre-operative vertebral CT images to the patient coordinate system in computer-assisted spinal surgery (7). This method was also applied to the registration of pre-operative pelvic CT images for percutaneous sacroiliac screwing (14) and for implant positioning in THA (15,16). The basic idea is that the US probe acts like a transcutaneous digitizing probe, by using 'specular reflection' on bone surfaces (the echo time in a given area is near to proportional to the distance between the transducer and the bone surface).…”
Section: Description Of the Echo Surgetics Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there might be inaccuracy in defining the actual top of the ASIS. However, the technique used is still robust, as a 10-mm error in the location of the top of the ASIS induces only a 3 error in inclination and a 4 error in flexion [13]. We observed that the intra-operative palpation of this plane by a cutaneous technique was reproducible, with a mean variation of less than 5 between different registrations in all three directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Some studies have shown that the APP is not appropriate for positioning the acetabular components [23]. To our knowledge, there is no reliable reference that can be easily identified during an operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%