2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2013.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cup and cap products in intersection (co)homology

Abstract: We construct cup and cap products in intersection (co)homology with field coefficients. The existence of the cap product allows us to give a new proof of Poincaré duality in intersection (co)homology which is similar in spirit to the usual proof for ordinary (co)homology of manifolds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, is a quasi-isomorphism for any ring R ([10, Theorem B]). This extends the Poincaré duality theorem of Friedman and McClure [16] established for field coefficients.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…, is a quasi-isomorphism for any ring R ([10, Theorem B]). This extends the Poincaré duality theorem of Friedman and McClure [16] established for field coefficients.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…This way, we obtain a sequence of δ-compatible morphisms f D * : π D * I p H r → π ′ D * I p H r . With I p C * (X) the singular rational intersection chain complex as in [18], we define intersection cochains by I p C * (X) = Hom(I p C * (X), Q) and intersection cohomology by I p H * (X) = H * (I p C * (X)). Then the universal coefficient theorem…”
Section: Examples Of Precosheavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the perversities of [21] defined on each stratum. They are already used in [22], [23], [12], [13], [15].…”
Section: Definition 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the proof is reduced to the study of the right-hand map. First, recall from [15] and [24,Proposition 2.2], that C * p,c (X) = lim − →K C * p (X, X\K) = C * p (X, X\{(0, v)}) and C ∞,p * (X) = lim ← −K C p * (X, X\K) = C * p (X, X\{(0, v)}). Thus, it is sufficient to prove the existence of a quasi-isomorphism,…”
Section: Lemma 25 the Conclusion Of Theorem 22 Is True Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation