Current Accessibility Challenges and Perspectives for People with Visual Impairments in Tabletop Games

Abstract

Much has already been discussed about the educational benefits of playing Tabletop games. However, as United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4.5 points out, there still exist many disparities in the access to quality education by vulnerable groups. This paper aims to address some of the factors that contribute to this disparity in regard to people with visual impairments in Brazil. Beyond that, there is a much more dire barrier of access to: the majority of information about the games is presented visually. In practice, people with visual impairments have to rely on the “goodwill” of other people to try and adapt the games for them, who are generally their teachers, friends or relatives. Lastly, this paper presents some accessibility criteria to be considered when designing board games for people with visual impairments, as well as present the Design in Partnership approach as a viable method to design more meaningful games for this context.

No Barriers: Strategies and Best Practices for the Employment of Individuals with Intellectual Disability

“…As Léste and Farbiarz (2023) suggest, hundreds of thousands of years ago, when early humans had no way to address myopia, the condition would be considered a disability, because people with myopia would be unable to perform the basic activities that were expected of them as part of a group: keeping a lookout for predators, spotting prey, distinguishing edible plants from poisonous ones, and so forth. Léste and Farbiarz (2023) further explain that, nowadays, myopia and other mild visual conditions are not considered visual disabilities only because the current infrastructure surrounding ophthalmological care is so advanced and pervasive that most people with myopia have access to different options of care to choose from: using prescription glasses, prescription lenses, or undergoing eye surgery -and, therefore, can live comfortably in society without facing additional barriers that stem from their condition. Similarly, when considering the BOS, would (or should) a person with an intellectual disability be considered "disabled" if the workplace is properly equipped to accommodate their needs and they can perform the same tasks, under the same standards?…”

Empowerment through Language, Inclusive Models, and Activism: Nurturing Inclusion for Individuals with Intellectual Disability

“…As Léste and Farbiarz (2023) suggest, hundreds of thousands of years ago, when early humans had no way to address myopia, the condition would be considered a disability, because people with myopia would be unable to perform the basic activities that were expected of them as part of a group: keeping a lookout for predators, spotting prey, distinguishing edible plants from poisonous ones, and so forth. Léste and Farbiarz (2023) further explain that, nowadays, myopia and other mild visual conditions are not considered visual disabilities only because the current infrastructure surrounding ophthalmological care is so advanced and pervasive that most people with myopia have access to different options of care to choose from: using prescription glasses, prescription lenses, or undergoing eye surgery -and, therefore, can live comfortably in society without facing additional barriers that stem from their condition. Similarly, when considering the BOS, would (or should) a person with an intellectual disability be considered "disabled" if the workplace is properly equipped to accommodate their needs and they can perform the same tasks, under the same standards?…”