2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and emerging tools for the recovery of genetic information from post mortem samples: New directions for disaster victim identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 262 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The qPCR-measured input DNA amounts of these four best performing bone DNA samples were all above 2.1 ng, while we obtained similar call rates of ~85% using 100pg of non-fragmented DNA. As our DNA quality experiments have shown that severely degraded DNA cannot be genotyped accurately with the GSA, the lower SNP microarray genotyping reliability can be attributed to the poor quality of nuclear DNA in the majority of the bone or teeth DNA samples tested (45). Notably, the SNP microarray results of these bone and teeth derived DNA samples were not in good agreement with results from forensic STR profiling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The qPCR-measured input DNA amounts of these four best performing bone DNA samples were all above 2.1 ng, while we obtained similar call rates of ~85% using 100pg of non-fragmented DNA. As our DNA quality experiments have shown that severely degraded DNA cannot be genotyped accurately with the GSA, the lower SNP microarray genotyping reliability can be attributed to the poor quality of nuclear DNA in the majority of the bone or teeth DNA samples tested (45). Notably, the SNP microarray results of these bone and teeth derived DNA samples were not in good agreement with results from forensic STR profiling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Since experimental DNA degradation is artificial and does not resemble natural degradation processes, we additionally analyzed bone and tooth derived DNA samples from skeletal remains. These DNA samples naturally degraded under varying conditions and combine decreased DNA quantity and decreased quality, which is typical in missing person cases (45). However, only a minority of the skeleton-derived naturally degraded DNA samples yielded high-enough call rates sufficient for concluding high genotype accuracy (two samples had call rate > 93%, two others were in the grey zone >85% call rate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since experimental DNA degradation is artificial and does not resemble natural degradation processes, we additionally analyzed bone and tooth derived DNA samples from skeletal remains. These DNA samples naturally degraded under varying conditions and combine decreased DNA quantity and decreased quality, which is typical in missing person cases [52]. However, only a minority of the skeleton-derived naturally degraded DNA samples yielded high-enough call rates sufficient for concluding high genotype accuracy (two samples had call rate > 93%, two others were in the grey zone > 85% call rate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STR-based DNA profiling has become the gold standard for identification purposes, especially for highly decomposed bodies or body fragments [1][2][3]. Fortunately, all human tissue contains cell nuclei and very small amounts can be used for DNA extraction [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%