2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11707-009-0011-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and future impacts of ultraviolet radiation on the terrestrial carbon balance

Abstract: One of the most documented effects of human activity on our environment is the reduction of stratospheric ozone resulting in an increase of biologically harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation. In a less predictable manner, UV radiation incident at the surface of the earth is expected to be further modified in the future as a result of altered cloud condition, atmospheric aerosol concentration, and snow cover. Although UV radiation comprises only a small fraction of the total solar radiation that is incident at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies reporting soil CO 2 efflux rates in several biomes, including temperate, boreal, tropical, Arctic and deserts have been published. This intense research has prompted excellent review summarizing methods (Kuzyakov, ; Subke et al ., ; Bruggemann et al ., ), processes (Smith et al ., ; Kuzyakov & Gavrichkova, ; Kim et al ., ), estimates for different biomes (Bond‐Lamberty & Thomson, ) and current challenges (Vargas et al ., ). Apart from evidencing great progress as well as limited understanding of the biological processes involved in soil respiration (Vargas et al ., ), non‐biological processes contributing to soil CO 2 efflux have not been considered in any of these synthesis papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies reporting soil CO 2 efflux rates in several biomes, including temperate, boreal, tropical, Arctic and deserts have been published. This intense research has prompted excellent review summarizing methods (Kuzyakov, ; Subke et al ., ; Bruggemann et al ., ), processes (Smith et al ., ; Kuzyakov & Gavrichkova, ; Kim et al ., ), estimates for different biomes (Bond‐Lamberty & Thomson, ) and current challenges (Vargas et al ., ). Apart from evidencing great progress as well as limited understanding of the biological processes involved in soil respiration (Vargas et al ., ), non‐biological processes contributing to soil CO 2 efflux have not been considered in any of these synthesis papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has highlighted numerous ways which UV-B could influence ecological processes, including plant litter decomposition and nutrient release [2,3]. Litter decomposition plays a key role in terrestrial carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depletion in stratospheric ozone and climate change factors may also affect levels of UV radiation reaching the ground surface (McKenzie et al 2011). The effects of UV‐B radiation on plant physiology are widely reported, and include damage to DNA and proteins (Qaderi and Reid 2005, Newsham and Robinson 2009), due to the high absorption affinity of these macromolecules within the UV‐B wavelength range, which in turn can lead to photosynthetic inhibition (Smith et al 2009). Negative effects of elevated UV‐B radiation on leaf area, shoot production, fine root production and root exudation have also been found (Tevini and Teramura 1989, Rinnan et al 2006, Yang et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of future UV‐B levels is difficult due to uncertainties about cloud cover and stratospheric ozone levels. The impacts of global warming on these factors are also unclear, as is the effect of remaining ozone‐depleting compounds (Smith et al 2009, McKenzie et al 2011). Any changes in UV‐B radiation will occur alongside other atmospheric trends such as increased atmospheric CO 2 , so it is important to consider interactions between these factors, particularly as CO 2 may modify UV‐B effects (Smith et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%