2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and future options of regeneration methods and reconstructive surgery of the facial skeleton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In the case of large-scale tissue loss, for example following tumour or trauma surgery (Figure 1), the defects can be restored by the use of individualized permanent implants ( Figure 1). When damage is greater than certain dimensions, surgeons mainly use titanium implants for permanent use (Figure 1), despite their known disadvantages, including high cost, weight, artefacts in CT, and MRI scanning and sensitivity to temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 In the case of large-scale tissue loss, for example following tumour or trauma surgery (Figure 1), the defects can be restored by the use of individualized permanent implants ( Figure 1). When damage is greater than certain dimensions, surgeons mainly use titanium implants for permanent use (Figure 1), despite their known disadvantages, including high cost, weight, artefacts in CT, and MRI scanning and sensitivity to temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of alternatives to autogenous bone replacement in the facial skeleton, such as scaffolds (SCs) with a bone-like interconnecting porous system, is one of the most difficult and necessary challenges in the combinational field of surgery and tissue engineering. 1,2 SCs have to possess various characteristics and biomechanical properties in order to match the bony host tissue, with a bone-like interconnecting porous system for vascular ingrowth, cell migration, and biocompatibility. [1][2][3] At the beginning of the 1960s, polymers came to the attention of orthopedic surgeons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations