Current Challenges and Opportunities for Better Integration of Human Factors Research with Development of Clinical Information Systems

Abstract

Summary Objectives Clinical information system (CIS) developers and implementers have begun to look to other scientific disciplines for new methods, tools, and techniques to help them better understand clinicians and their organizational structures, clinical work environments, capabilities of clinical information and communications technology, and the way these structures and processes interact. The goal of this article is to help CIS researchers, developers, implementers, and evaluators better understand the methods, tools, techniques, and literature of the field of human factors. Methods We developed a framework that explains how six key human factors topics relate to the design, implementation, and evaluation of CISs. Results Using this framework we discuss the following six topics: 1) informatics and patient safety; 2) user interface design and evaluation; 3) workflow and task analysis; 4) clinical decision making and decision support; 5) distributed cognition; and 6) mental workload and situation awareness. Conclusions Integrating the methods, tools, and lessons learned from each of these six areas of human factors research early in CIS design and incorporating them iteratively during development can improve user performance, user satisfaction, and integration into clinical workflow. Ultimately, this approach will improve clinical information systems and healthcare delivery.

Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities

“…The involvement of human factors engineering, cognitive engineering, interaction design, psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc, in all phases of HIT design and implementation will not be a panacea, but could substantially improve HIT usability, efficiency, safety, and user satisfaction. 80 …”

The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction

“…24 Therefore, human factors experts gather data about human characteristics and human interactions with the work environment to design systems and tools that support physical and cognitive abilities of humans and are resilient to unanticipated events. 4 This includes gathering data on:…”

“…2 The goals of human factors in healthcare are twofold: (1) support the cognitive and physical work of healthcare professionals 3 and (2) promote high quality, safe care for patients. 4 Human factors knowledge has been suggested as a promising mechanism with which to improve healthcare delivery, [5][6][7] yet this body of knowledge remains largely untapped. The reasons for this are not fully known.…”

Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety

“…Although most researchers are well aware that normally EMR does not lead directly to patient safety outcomes (i.e., they are aware that the black box exists and might have some ideas of its content [see, e.g., Kaushal and Bates 2002; Walker and Carayon 2009]), the error-based paradigm does not offer a coherent account of the pathway, or mechanism , between EMR and patient safety. In contrast, applying the performance mechanism from the HF paradigm suggests that the way that EMR improves or worsens outcomes including patient safety depends on how an EMR-enabled work system alters cognitive performance for the better or worse (Figure 1d; see a similar HF-based view, although focusing mostly on altered information and workflow, in Saleem et al 2009). …”