2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.05.442781
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current challenges in microbiome metadata collection

Abstract: While the biomedical community has embraced data sharing (e.g. results, raw data) and supported establishment of large research consortia (e.g. the Human Microbiome Project) aimed to standardize the quality of important sets of microbiome sequencing data, the reusability of most microbiome data is still limited by the quality of its associated metadata. To ensure that microbiome data is indeed FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable), it is necessary to consider tools and approaches that make i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During metadata collection, we encountered difficulties in locating African metadata in public repositories, even with advanced query keywords, prompting us to extend data searches through the literature. This is probably due to the inadequate annotation and erroneous terms in the public repositories, as stated previously ( 39 , 40 ). Furthermore, a major investment was required to complete and harmonize the information before integration in the AHMP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During metadata collection, we encountered difficulties in locating African metadata in public repositories, even with advanced query keywords, prompting us to extend data searches through the literature. This is probably due to the inadequate annotation and erroneous terms in the public repositories, as stated previously ( 39 , 40 ). Furthermore, a major investment was required to complete and harmonize the information before integration in the AHMP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rosenfeld et al. ( 40 ) reported the predominance of missing information, particularly regarding the age, ethnic group and gender of the participants. This is pertinent when it deals with metadata related to the African populations, which represent different genetic, geographical and environmental backgrounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%