2017
DOI: 10.1186/s41241-017-0015-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current challenges in the therapeutic use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in cancer therapy

Abstract: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) technology has catapulted the field of stem-cell biology through ectopic expression of reprogramming factors. Ever since its discovery, the potential of iPSCs has been explored by many scientists to unravel the molecular mechanism responsible for cancer initiation and progression. Besides modeling cancer, the further applications of this technology includes high-throughput drug screening, epigenetic reprogramming of cancer cell state to normal, immunotherapy and regenerat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current cell reprogramming methods involve processes that limit their clinical and widespread use, for example, the reliance on viral vectors for efficient transfection and intracellular delivery, and the need for sequential and repeated delivery of genes and factors. [ 66,67 ] However, it is by now also well known that engineered nanotopographical cues influence cell behavior by modulating intracellular signaling, and importantly for the purpose of this perspective, can induce neural morphology and phenotype even in non‐neural cells in vitro ( Table 2 ). [ 68–71 ] If we can mechanically stimulate the cell's own intracellular signaling pathways enabling dedifferentiation and/or redifferentiation, thereby facilitating either transdifferentiation or reprogramming, the hope is that we can reduce or even eliminate the reliance on viral vector‐mediated introduction of foreign material into cells, which may render them more amenable to cell therapy applications.…”
Section: Reprogramming and Transdifferentiation: Can Va‐ns Arrays Unlock Unlimited Human Neural Cell Generation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current cell reprogramming methods involve processes that limit their clinical and widespread use, for example, the reliance on viral vectors for efficient transfection and intracellular delivery, and the need for sequential and repeated delivery of genes and factors. [ 66,67 ] However, it is by now also well known that engineered nanotopographical cues influence cell behavior by modulating intracellular signaling, and importantly for the purpose of this perspective, can induce neural morphology and phenotype even in non‐neural cells in vitro ( Table 2 ). [ 68–71 ] If we can mechanically stimulate the cell's own intracellular signaling pathways enabling dedifferentiation and/or redifferentiation, thereby facilitating either transdifferentiation or reprogramming, the hope is that we can reduce or even eliminate the reliance on viral vector‐mediated introduction of foreign material into cells, which may render them more amenable to cell therapy applications.…”
Section: Reprogramming and Transdifferentiation: Can Va‐ns Arrays Unlock Unlimited Human Neural Cell Generation?mentioning
confidence: 99%