2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/350169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Challenges to the United States’ AIDS Drug Assistance Program and Possible Implications of the Affordable Care Act

Abstract: AIDS Drug Assistance Programs, enacted through the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, are the “payer of last resort” for prescription medications for lower income, uninsured, or underinsured people living with HIV/AIDS. ADAPs face declining funding from the federal government. State funding of ADAP is discretionary, but some states increased their contributions to meet the gap in funding. The demand for ADAP support is increasing as people living with HIV are living longer; the anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 ADAP is funded through annual federal allocations and discretionary state support; federal funding has declined in the last few years. 8 Although many ADAP clients in Medicaid expansion states are being shifted to public insurance, in Medicaid nonexpansion states the need for continued strong ADAP funding persists because ADAPs fund direct provision of medications or support patients' enrollment in QHPs. In addition, consideration should be given to redirecting ADAP funds that have been spent on medications to provide support for services not currently covered by insurance programs such as case management, adherence support, and housing assistance that have improved HIV outcomes.…”
Section: Adapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 ADAP is funded through annual federal allocations and discretionary state support; federal funding has declined in the last few years. 8 Although many ADAP clients in Medicaid expansion states are being shifted to public insurance, in Medicaid nonexpansion states the need for continued strong ADAP funding persists because ADAPs fund direct provision of medications or support patients' enrollment in QHPs. In addition, consideration should be given to redirecting ADAP funds that have been spent on medications to provide support for services not currently covered by insurance programs such as case management, adherence support, and housing assistance that have improved HIV outcomes.…”
Section: Adapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,43 Disruptions in treatment, however, reduce the clinical and public health benefits of cART. 31,32 This not only makes today's spending on HIV drugs less cost-effective, but it also reduces future cost savings from reduced HIV incidence resulting from the preventive benefits of cART.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Individuals who cannot suppress their viral loads are also at increased risk of acquiring AIDS and transmitting the virus to others. 2,3,4 Viral load suppression is one of the primary public health goals for People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), and a high priority for maintaining and ensuring a high quality of life and wellbeing for these individuals. 5,6 The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 76% of individuals who are in care achieve viral load suppression, highlighting the importance of encouraging HIV-infected individuals to get into care as soon as possible, and stay in care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Poor medication adherence can lead to reduced health outcomes for PLWHA and an increase in drug resistant HIV strains that can be transmitted to others. 3,15,16 Because of the strong connection between poverty and vulnerability to HIV infection, prodigious attention has been focused on the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the impoverished city of Detroit, Michigan, a region devastated by economic and financial struggle in recent years. According to 2013 estimates, Detroit has the highest HIV prevalence rate in Michigan, at 7040 per 100,000 individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation