2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4883297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-driven domain wall mobility in polycrystalline Permalloy nanowires: A numerical study

Abstract: A complete understanding of domain wall motion in magnetic nanowires is required to enable future nanowire based spintronics devices to work reliably. The production process dictates that the samples are polycrystalline. In this contribution, we present a method to investigate the effects of material grains on domain wall motion using the GPU-based micromagnetic software package MuMax3. We use this method to study current-driven vortex domain wall motion in polycrystalline Permalloy nanowires and find that the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible origins for the symmetry breaking leading to incoherent precession of m DW in different parts of the DW could be edge effects, and/or quenched disorder, interacting with the DW [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; these may include dislocations, precipitates, grain boundaries, thickness fluctuations of the strip, etc. Here we explore the dynamics of extended DWs in wide CoPtCr PMA strips, with a Bloch wall equilibrium structure, using large-scale micromagnetic simulations with and without quenched disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possible origins for the symmetry breaking leading to incoherent precession of m DW in different parts of the DW could be edge effects, and/or quenched disorder, interacting with the DW [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; these may include dislocations, precipitates, grain boundaries, thickness fluctuations of the strip, etc. Here we explore the dynamics of extended DWs in wide CoPtCr PMA strips, with a Bloch wall equilibrium structure, using large-scale micromagnetic simulations with and without quenched disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for the effect of quenched disorder, here assumed to originate from the polycrystalline structure of the strip [41], we construct grains using a Voronoi tessella- tion [14,15], with an average grain size of 11.9 nm [35]; see the inset of Fig. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damping parameter, α, described in Ref. 15, was set to 0.018, and the saturation magnetization M sat = 1.40 × 10 6 A/m. A uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy of 4100 J/m 3 with random direction was present in each cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Micromagnetic simulations provide a tool to study the effect of edge roughness or anisotropy variations, subject to the limitations of the discretization cell size, which should be similar to the exchange length. LER can be introduced into a simulation by removing cells or blocks of cells from the edge of a nanowire in a model with cuboidal 14,15 or tetrahedral cells. 6 Other studies use a Voronoi cell geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also investigate the effect of α on the relaxation process, using values ranging from the typical 0.01 for pure permalloy up to 0. magnetization dynamics of permalloy, they allow us to address the more general question of the effect of damping on the defect coarsening dynamics. Moreover, we also check the stability of our results with respect to adding quenched structural disorder to the system [27][28][29][30][31], by performing a Voronoi tessellation to divide the films into grains, mimicking the polycrystalline structure of the material [30,31]; we consider average grain sizes of 10, 20, and 40 nm. Disorder is then implemented by either setting a random saturation magnetization in each grain (from a normal distribution with mean M s and standard deviation of 0.1M s or 0.2M s ) [27,30], or decreasing the exchange coupling across the grain boundaries by 10%, 30%, or 50% [30,31].…”
Section: A Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%