2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-induced domain wall motion: Comparison of STT and SHE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9(b) (red curve). As SOT devices are able to operate at lower current density [24], [25], we reduce the magnitude of the applied J to 10 × 10 10 A/m 2 . This charge current passes through the HM, which generates a vertical spin current that exerts SOT on the local magnetization in BL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9(b) (red curve). As SOT devices are able to operate at lower current density [24], [25], we reduce the magnitude of the applied J to 10 × 10 10 A/m 2 . This charge current passes through the HM, which generates a vertical spin current that exerts SOT on the local magnetization in BL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopically, the motion is related to an interaction between the magnetic moments of the layer and the current which applies a specific torque moment on them. The current could flow directly through the ferromagnetic track generating the so-called spin-transfer torque (STT) [3], or through the heavy metal giving rise to the spin-orbit torque (SOT) [4] in response to the spin currents generated. The synchronization and stabilization of the magnetic domains is fundamental for the correct functionality of the memory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%