2022 9th International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD) 2022
DOI: 10.23919/cmd54214.2022.9991407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Integration Method as a Reliable Tool for Diagnosing Flame-retardant EPDM Cables Removed from Nuclear Power Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the insulation degradation of low-voltage cables insulated with FR-EPDM, removed from NPPs, was investigated [20][21][22][23]. As a result, it has become clear that the electrical resistance of the insulation is significantly higher in cables removed after many years of installation in NPPs than that of an unused new cable [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the insulation degradation of low-voltage cables insulated with FR-EPDM, removed from NPPs, was investigated [20][21][22][23]. As a result, it has become clear that the electrical resistance of the insulation is significantly higher in cables removed after many years of installation in NPPs than that of an unused new cable [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the insulation degradation of low-voltage cables insulated with FR-EPDM, removed from NPPs, was investigated [20][21][22][23]. As a result, it has become clear that the electrical resistance of the insulation is significantly higher in cables removed after many years of installation in NPPs than that of an unused new cable [20,21]. This paper discusses the reason for the high electrical resistance measured in the harvested cables mainly by referring to typical related experimental results acquired by us for sheet samples of the same FR-EPDM [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%