2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-015-2135-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current knowledge and importance of dGEMRIC techniques in diagnosis of hip joint diseases

Abstract: Accurate assessment of early hip joint cartilage alterations may help optimize patient selection and follow-up of hip joint preservation surgery. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is sensitive to the glycosaminoglycan content in cartilage that is lost early in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). Hence, the dGEMRIC technique holds promise for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, because of the location of the hip joint deep within… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the 12-month change in standardised dGEMRIC z-scores for the acetabular and femoral head cartilage ROIs at the chondrolabral junction will be analysed, using the central femoral cartilage ROI as an internal control [ 31 , 32 ]. The dGEMRIC technique has been proven reliable for quantification and detection of changes in the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of the hip joint cartilage [ 33 36 ]. Since the loss of GAG in cartilage is an early OA-related change [ 37 ], dGEMRIC enables the likelihood of future OA development to be compared between treatment methods after a relatively short period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the 12-month change in standardised dGEMRIC z-scores for the acetabular and femoral head cartilage ROIs at the chondrolabral junction will be analysed, using the central femoral cartilage ROI as an internal control [ 31 , 32 ]. The dGEMRIC technique has been proven reliable for quantification and detection of changes in the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of the hip joint cartilage [ 33 36 ]. Since the loss of GAG in cartilage is an early OA-related change [ 37 ], dGEMRIC enables the likelihood of future OA development to be compared between treatment methods after a relatively short period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a debate whether precontrast T1-mapping (T1 0 ) in addition to postcontrast T1-mapping (T1 Gd ) is necessary, or if postcontrast evaluation alone provides accurate information in the native hip; however, precontrast images are recommended after cartilage repair because T1 0 values may differ significantly from normal cartilage. 88,89 The time required for a dGEMRIC examination remains one of its major disadvantages, as well as the inherent cost from gadolinium utilization. Initial dGEMRIC investigations used T1-weighted inversion recovery sequences due to widespread availability and ease of implementation, but they suffered from long acquisitions, motion artifacts, and low resolution, often requiring femoral and acetabular articular cartilage to be evaluated as a single unit, rather than distinct measurable tissues.…”
Section: Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced Mri Of Cartilagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…88 More current techniques utilize 3D sequences that can evaluate local as well as widespread cartilage changes, and they were shown to be at least as reliable as conventional 2D techniques. 89 In the hip, dGEMRIC has been applied to FAI, DDH, and Legg-Calvé-Perthes (LCP) disease to assess cartilage quality. [88][89][90][91][92][93][94] Kim and colleagues observed measurable decreases in T1 values (dGEMERIC index) with worsening degrees of hip dysplasia, from 570 ms (no dysplasia) to 420 ms (severe dysplasia).…”
Section: Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced Mri Of Cartilagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assessment of radiographs and, in most circumstances, MRI relies on 2D images being interpreted by human observers to give a semiquantitative score or grade of disease: for example the KL system grades from 0 to 4 (equating to none-possible-mild-moderate-severe) 8 . Beyond morphological cartilage thickness measurement 14 , other quantitative MRI techniques such as compositional T2, T1rho, ultrashort echo and dGEMRIC (delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage) time measurements have been developed, but their role in prognostication is yet to be clearly defined 15,16 . Semiquantitative MRI scoring systems have also been developed for the assessment of disease at the hip (HOAMS) and knee (MOAKS) 17,18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%