2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current methods and limitations for longitudinal fMRI analysis across development

Abstract: The human brain is remarkably plastic. The brain changes dramatically across development, with ongoing functional development continuing well into the third decade of life and substantial changes occurring again in older age. Dynamic changes in brain function are thought to underlie the innumerable changes in cognition, emotion, and behavior that occur across development. The brain also changes in response to experience, which raises important questions about how the environment influences the developing brain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A true FWE rate of 5% can also be achieved via nonparametric methods (Eklund et al, 2016). One piece of software, Neuropointillist, provides a flexible framework that allows researchers to use cluster computing resources for custom, voxel-wise neuroimaging analyses, which could include non-parametric tests specific to complex designs (Madhyastha et al, 2018). Other ostensible barriers to employing these methods in non-experimental designs have been overcome, such as how to handle covariates (Winkler, Ridgway, Webster, Smith, & Nichols, 2014), and how to permute data in nested designs (Winkler, Webster, Vidaurre, Nichols, & Smith 2015).…”
Section: Box 1: Spotlight On Conducting and Reporting Cluster-based Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A true FWE rate of 5% can also be achieved via nonparametric methods (Eklund et al, 2016). One piece of software, Neuropointillist, provides a flexible framework that allows researchers to use cluster computing resources for custom, voxel-wise neuroimaging analyses, which could include non-parametric tests specific to complex designs (Madhyastha et al, 2018). Other ostensible barriers to employing these methods in non-experimental designs have been overcome, such as how to handle covariates (Winkler, Ridgway, Webster, Smith, & Nichols, 2014), and how to permute data in nested designs (Winkler, Webster, Vidaurre, Nichols, & Smith 2015).…”
Section: Box 1: Spotlight On Conducting and Reporting Cluster-based Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the multifactorial nature of longitudinal data sets, such analyses may be more complex in nature and can be accompanied by further confounding factors (e.g. linear or non-linear developmental trajectories depending on domain and process studied; see for instance Madhyastha et al, 2018). A potential difficulty is the differentiation of change and error in longitudinal modelling, as changes might reflect a combination of low measurement reliability and true developmental change (see for an excellent discussion of this topic).…”
Section: Methodological Challenges In Developmental Cognitive Neuroscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related differences in connectivity parameters were further probed across data from both longitudinal timepoints using a mixed model approach in R with the package nlme (Pinheiro, Bates, DebRoy, Sarkar, & Team, 2018 Madhyastha et al, 2017). Likelihood ratio tests between the intercept-only, linear, quadratic, and cubic models were used to determine whether the age-related models with significant age parameters significantly improved model fit over the intercept-only model or the next simplest model with a significant age parameter.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%