2013
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2013.836058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current pharmacological concepts for wise use of echinocandins in the treatment ofCandidainfections in septic critically ill patients

Abstract: Candida infections represent challenging causes of severe sepsis and/or of septic shock in the critically ill patients. Knowledge of current pharmacological concepts may promote a more wise use of echinocandins in the management of Candida infections in this setting. Echinocandins have some advantages over azoles, both pharmacodynamically (rapid fungicidal activity, anti-biofilm activity, unmodified activity against Candida isolates with decreased susceptibility to azoles and anti-cytokine/anti-chemokine activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More surprisingly to us was to find that 12% and 9.2% of physicians would select L-AmB and voriconazole, respectively, instead of a candin to treat these fluconazole-resistant Candida infections. L-AmB should be restricted to selected cases of intra-abdominal candidiasis [ 35 , 36 ] or intolerance to other antifungal agents due to its potential toxicity and higher cost, and voriconazole should be limited to step-down oral therapy for selected cases of candidiasis due to C. krusei or voriconazole-susceptible C. glabrata [ 7 ]. Finally, we would like to stress that there are differences among published guidelines regarding some diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of candidiasis that need to be clarified for the sake of a more clear understanding by the prescribing physicians [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More surprisingly to us was to find that 12% and 9.2% of physicians would select L-AmB and voriconazole, respectively, instead of a candin to treat these fluconazole-resistant Candida infections. L-AmB should be restricted to selected cases of intra-abdominal candidiasis [ 35 , 36 ] or intolerance to other antifungal agents due to its potential toxicity and higher cost, and voriconazole should be limited to step-down oral therapy for selected cases of candidiasis due to C. krusei or voriconazole-susceptible C. glabrata [ 7 ]. Finally, we would like to stress that there are differences among published guidelines regarding some diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of candidiasis that need to be clarified for the sake of a more clear understanding by the prescribing physicians [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although C. albicans is the most common yeast found with IAI, non-C. albicans species, including C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis, are isolated with increasing frequency [375,[502][503][504]. Candida glabrata may be intrinsically resistant or demonstrate dose-dependent susceptibility to fluconazole; voriconazole has much better activity against this organism [505].…”
Section: Selection Of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy For Adult Patients With Ha-iaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, among septic patients, echinocandin exposure seems to be lower than in healthy volunteers [26–28], and patients with severe hypoalbuminemia have lower plasma trough levels of echinocandins [29]. Considering the rather frequent occurrence of malnutrition and severe hypoalbuminemia in the elderly [30], all these findings justify pharmacokinetic studies of the 3 echinocandins in this patient population. Finally, we recorded a high mortality rate among patients without septic shock receiving fluconazole (32.2%) vs those receiving echinocandins (14.2%; P = .002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%