2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Smoking and Prognosis After Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Smoking is associated with enhanced inflammation acutely, infarct-zone hemorrhage subsequently, and longer term adverse cardiac outcomes. Inflammation and irreversible myocardial hemorrhage post-MI represent mechanistic drivers for adverse long-term prognosis in smokers. (Detection and Significance of Heart Injury in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. [BHF MR-MI]; NCT02072850).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
40
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(90 reference statements)
6
40
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding dyslipidemia, our data was matching with what Haig C et al (14) found and we found that there was a statistically significant difference between smokers and non-smokers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding dyslipidemia, our data was matching with what Haig C et al (14) found and we found that there was a statistically significant difference between smokers and non-smokers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Clinical presentation (Canadian Cardiovascular Society anginal classification) for both smokers and nonsmokers was similar in our study, with similar phenomena that have been reported in the past studies [11,16,25]. Similarly, diabetes and hypertension were less prevalent among smokers than nonsmokers, this is a consistent finding among various studies from other parts of the world [11,15,16,18e29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found a similar distribution of culprit arteries in the smoker and nonsmoker groups, which was consistent with some of the past studies [11,22e25]. But Rakowski et al [16] and Goto et al [19] reported [19] 44.5 vs. 60.1 0.001* Symons et al [22] 42.3 vs. 48.8 0.16 Katayama et al [24] 43.1 vs. 41.9 0.779 Haig et al [25] 26.5 vs. 41.4 0.007* Diabetes mellitus Gupta et al [11] 32.2 vs. 61.7 <0.001* Shemirani et al [23] 17.0 vs. 36.2 0.02* Rakowski et al [16] 10.0 vs. 18.6 <0.001* Goto et al [19] 12.5 vs. 19.7 0.001* Symons et al [22] 11.0 vs. 18.4 0.02* Katayama et al [24] 31.0 vs. 37.2 0.141 Haig et al [25] 10.2 vs. 10.9…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Con respecto a los otros factores de riesgo coronarios descritos, llama la atención la alta frecuencia de sedentarismo y de consumo de tabaco, similar a la reportada por otros estudios (17,18) realizados en Colombia y Cuba . También en otras regiones del mundo encontraron que frecuencia (12,14,(19)(20)(21)(22) alta de sedentarismo y de consumo de tabaco como factores de riesgo coronario . En relación a (23) la dislipidemia, c-HDL cumple un rol importante como predictor de enfermedad cardiovascular .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified