Construction Research Congress 2014 2014
DOI: 10.1061/9780784413517.230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current State of Interface Management in Mega-construction Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dossick & Neff's (2011) research into the use of BIM by multiple knowledge groups found that users were having opposing interpretations of its promise neither was it able to foster closer collaboration across different companies without prior inter-organisational alignment strategies. Understanding of the multilevel constituency alignment, coupled with effective interface or boundary management strategies, can potentially improve alignment and reduce conflicts between the myriad stakeholders by increasing visibility on roles, responsibilities and project deliverables (Shokri et al, 2014;Archibald, 2003). The potential of this concept is explored in this study as analytical lens for strategy development towards the transformation of BIM-enabled construction project organisations (e.g., Markard et al, 2012;Berggren et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspective: Multilevel Inter-organisational Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dossick & Neff's (2011) research into the use of BIM by multiple knowledge groups found that users were having opposing interpretations of its promise neither was it able to foster closer collaboration across different companies without prior inter-organisational alignment strategies. Understanding of the multilevel constituency alignment, coupled with effective interface or boundary management strategies, can potentially improve alignment and reduce conflicts between the myriad stakeholders by increasing visibility on roles, responsibilities and project deliverables (Shokri et al, 2014;Archibald, 2003). The potential of this concept is explored in this study as analytical lens for strategy development towards the transformation of BIM-enabled construction project organisations (e.g., Markard et al, 2012;Berggren et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspective: Multilevel Inter-organisational Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it aims at managing the problems that often occur among people, departments, and disciplines rather than within the project team itself (Sugumaran and Lavanya, 2013). As much as it was effective, alignment level among participants will be improved and conflicts will be reduced; that is because it increases the clarity on roles, responsibilities, as well as deliverables, especially in large projects (Shokri et al, 2014). This significance could be succinctly captured in this quotation: "Interfaces, joints and connections between different elements or sections cause more problems than most of the rest of the building" (Pavitt and Gibb, 2003, P.8).…”
Section: Significance Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%