2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current State of Radial Artery Catheterization in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Currently, the routine use of thrombus aspiration during PCI is not indicated, and selective use is viewed as poorly founded (ACC-AHA class IIb recommendation, evidence level C). 23 In response to adverse outcomes associated with bleeding complications of PCI, radial-artery access has been advocated for coronary angiography and PCI, 32 particularly for patients with STEMI, in whom bleeding at the access site is most common. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials comparing transradial with transfemoral PCI for the treatment of STEMI showed that radial access was associated with lower rates of accesssite bleeding (2.1% vs. 5.6%), major bleeding (1.4% vs. 2.9%), and death (2.7% vs. 4.7%), despite a procedure time that was 2 minutes longer.…”
Section: Therapeutic Target Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 Currently, the routine use of thrombus aspiration during PCI is not indicated, and selective use is viewed as poorly founded (ACC-AHA class IIb recommendation, evidence level C). 23 In response to adverse outcomes associated with bleeding complications of PCI, radial-artery access has been advocated for coronary angiography and PCI, 32 particularly for patients with STEMI, in whom bleeding at the access site is most common. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials comparing transradial with transfemoral PCI for the treatment of STEMI showed that radial access was associated with lower rates of accesssite bleeding (2.1% vs. 5.6%), major bleeding (1.4% vs. 2.9%), and death (2.7% vs. 4.7%), despite a procedure time that was 2 minutes longer.…”
Section: Therapeutic Target Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 One challenge to rapid adoption of the radial approach in general practice is overcoming the learning curve for achieving the outcomes observed in clinical trials. 32…”
Section: Therapeutic Target Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Although the superiority of transradial access over the femoral access is proven, in addition to the undeniable benefits to patients, the femoral route is a priority among more experienced operators. 18,19 In Angola, in recent years, the trend has been the use of transradial access for PCI, which is associated with lower rates of complications, mortality and shorter hospital stay, especially in patients with acute MI. 20 Reducing the delay in the first medical contact remains one of the great challenges in Angola; however there is a need to address some aspects that decisively influence the context of delay for patients in the country, making this an "Achilles heel" in our daily practice, a fact that was reflected in this investigation, with inadmissible delays for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the radial access is a class 1 recommendation according to European Society of Cardiology guidelines, whereas the AHA/ACC guidelines do not give an explicit recommendation. 59 Radial access will continue to surpass femoral access, and its mortality benefit has been repeatedly shown. In the setting of unstable STEMI/ACS necessitating temporary pacing and/or large-bore access for hemodynamic support, it is unclear whether there is still superiority with radial access.…”
Section: Future Directions and Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%