2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10836-012-5339-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current State of the Mixed-Signal Test Bus 1149.4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As trace 4 is not defective in all PCBs, voltage ratios in Fig. 14a look similar apart from some deviations in the defective PCBs due to the other traces.…”
Section: T Race 4 Testingmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As trace 4 is not defective in all PCBs, voltage ratios in Fig. 14a look similar apart from some deviations in the defective PCBs due to the other traces.…”
Section: T Race 4 Testingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…On the other hand, the AXI solution is expensive and slow for testing every manufactured PCB, especially for electronics where long-term reliability is not important. Moreover, boundary-scan testing which has seen great progress from standardization point of view is not always applicable, this is due to diversity of today PCBs which may contain non-boundary-scan-compliant components [4,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, up to now, IEEE 1149.4 has not been widely used commercially due to several reasons, such as its IC area concern; its implementation costs; its low measurement frequency bandwidth, which is approximately 1 MHz; and its higher measurement error, which may arise because of the higher impedance of silicon switches [8,22]. With this situation, boundary-scan defect coverage remains unimproved in the same manner as coverage with IEEE 1149.1.…”
Section: Boundary-scan and Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An upgrade of the standard has been discussed in [Han12]. In two papers [San09,Lin14], the sinus output response was suggested for better characterisation, while the second paper introduces precision on-chip measurements.…”
Section: Irf Detection Using Boundary-scan Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%