2007
DOI: 10.2174/157016407783221349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Status of Computational Approaches for Protein Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectra

Abstract: Proteomics is a still-evolving combination of technologies to describe and characterize all expressed proteins in a biological system. Because of upper limits on mass detection of mass spectrometers, the bottom-up approach is most widely employed in which tryptic peptides are quantified and identified from complex protein mixtures. Protein identification from tandem mass spectra is still a challenge in proteomics. Two approaches have been developed to identify proteins from tandem mass spectra, database search… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many computational approaches have been proposed to analyze and process experimental data generated from MS for proteomics research [ 22 , 32 ]. Among these techniques, ANN-based methods are good choices for their capability of deriving useful information from complicated or imprecise data without the need of a detailed understanding of the underlying phenomena [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many computational approaches have been proposed to analyze and process experimental data generated from MS for proteomics research [ 22 , 32 ]. Among these techniques, ANN-based methods are good choices for their capability of deriving useful information from complicated or imprecise data without the need of a detailed understanding of the underlying phenomena [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide selection, fractionation and separation on chromatographic columns may be modelled with various methods. We have developed an algorithm to predict the fractionation of peptides in strong anion exchange (SAX) chromatography using a pattern classification technique based on artificial neural network (ANN) method [ 22 , 23 ]. An ANN has also been used to predict peptide separation in reversed phase (RP) chromatography [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the most effective predictor, we have investigated 12 different classifiers that performed outstandingly in numerous biological quandaries [39], [43], [57], [60], [70]- [80]. These classifiers are: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) [39], Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) [43], Support Vector Machine (SVM) [57], [60], Random Forest (RF) [70], [71], Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light-GBM) [72], [73], Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) [74], Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) [75], Bootstrap Aggregating (Bagging) [76], Decision Tree (DT) [77], TABLE 3. Performance comparison between our proposed method and MaloPred [37], kmal-sp [39] for predicting the malonylation sites of the individual species (Homo sapiens, Mus musculus) and total species (six species) based on the independent test.…”
Section: E Classification Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of probability-based or statistical methods in current algorithms is very restrictive, and most of these ultimately take a heuristic approach. McHugh and Arthur6 , 7 recognize the limiting factor in current protein identification methods as a trade-off between false positives and false negatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%