2015
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.6.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current–voltage characteristics of manganite–titanite perovskite junctions

Abstract: SummaryAfter a general introduction into the Shockley theory of current voltage (J–V) characteristics of inorganic and organic semiconductor junctions of different bandwidth, we apply the Shockley theory-based, one diode model to a new type of perovskite junctions with polaronic charge carriers. In particular, we studied manganite–titanate p–n heterojunctions made of n-doped SrTi1− yNbyO3, y = 0.002 and p-doped Pr1− xCaxMnO3, x = 0.34 having a strongly correlated electron system. The diffusion length of the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the approach of a dead layer successfully describing electron holography data is a too rough approximation for LE‐STEBIC of Si junctions. For PCMO–STNO with a threshold tth(PS)=80nm smaller than tth(Si), but still larger than the combined PCMO–STNO diffusion length of normalLnormalD(PCMO)+normalLnormalD(STNO)=21nm , the effect of surface recombination should be less pronounced. For a rough estimate, it can be assumed that surface recombination considerably affects the injection level in the material once the sample thickness is comparable or smaller than the diffusion length which is the case for the Si junction for all thicknesses, whereas for PCMO–STNO the condition is met close to tth(PS). Hence, for the systems studied here we have to conclude that both, dead layers and surface (interface) recombination have to be taken into account in a quantitative model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the approach of a dead layer successfully describing electron holography data is a too rough approximation for LE‐STEBIC of Si junctions. For PCMO–STNO with a threshold tth(PS)=80nm smaller than tth(Si), but still larger than the combined PCMO–STNO diffusion length of normalLnormalD(PCMO)+normalLnormalD(STNO)=21nm , the effect of surface recombination should be less pronounced. For a rough estimate, it can be assumed that surface recombination considerably affects the injection level in the material once the sample thickness is comparable or smaller than the diffusion length which is the case for the Si junction for all thicknesses, whereas for PCMO–STNO the condition is met close to tth(PS). Hence, for the systems studied here we have to conclude that both, dead layers and surface (interface) recombination have to be taken into account in a quantitative model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PCMO–STNO p–n heterojunctions have been prepared as described in detail in . Briefly, a 100 nm thick PCMO layer was epitaxially grown by ion beam sputter deposition on an STNO substrate, and sputtered Au and Ti ohmic contacts were used, as illustrated in the inset of Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where J 0 is the temperature-independent prefactor of an Arrhenius-type temperature dependence of J S , which depends on intrinsic material properties. In the case of homojunctions, E B is determined by the band gap; meanwhile, in heterojunctions, E B can be limited by the band offsets [29,32]. V OC should linearly scale with temperature and the logarithm of the short-circuit current density, and the relevant activation barrier can be deduced from the intercept E B = V OC (T → 0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%