1988
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90467-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curved helix segments can uniquely orient the topology of supertwisted DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
93
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Figure 2, the X-type cruciforms tend to be localized at the loops of the plectonemic superhelix. As shown earlier, intrinsically bent DNA regions prefer an apical localization in supercoiled DNA (Laundon & Grif®th, 1988). Our data suggest that cruciforms, like bent DNA sequences, are elements that can dictate a spatial geometry to a DNA superhelix.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Supercoilstabilized Cruciformsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…As seen in Figure 2, the X-type cruciforms tend to be localized at the loops of the plectonemic superhelix. As shown earlier, intrinsically bent DNA regions prefer an apical localization in supercoiled DNA (Laundon & Grif®th, 1988). Our data suggest that cruciforms, like bent DNA sequences, are elements that can dictate a spatial geometry to a DNA superhelix.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Supercoilstabilized Cruciformsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…An example illustrating the strong effect of a bound protein on the concentration of sites in a supercoiled DNA is one proposed for the binding of E. coli RNA polymerase to the sharply bent ends of loops in a supercoiled DNA (Heggeler-Bordellier et al 1992): the concentration of DNA sites in the neighbourhood of the tip of a supercoiled loop is likely to be much lower than that around a DNA site when the DNA is allowed to access all its spatial configurations. The presence of segments with stable bends may similarly reduce greatly the number of configurational states of a supercoiled DNA (Laundon & Griffith 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s 2 is favored instead, except for pBR nucleosomes in Mg 2þ -minus buffer ( Table 2). The reason lies in the contributions to G n (i) in equation (11), which were again not taken into account in the theory. In addition to the abovementioned electrostatic repulsion which favors the sO state, two more contributions can be identified.…”
Section: Loop End Conditions and Nucleosome Ability For Positive Crosmentioning
confidence: 99%