“…Denoised output images of 'Lena' using the: (a) CT [12], (b) NLM [3], (c) MBF [13], (d) NLMNT [17], (e) BM3D [19], (f) GSRC [21], (g) CT-NLM-GF [25], and (h) proposed denoising model with = 30 Figure. 7 Denoised output images of 'Lena' using the: (a) CT [12], (b) NLM [3], (c) MBF [13], (d) NLMNT [17], (e) BM3D [19], (f) GSRC [21], (g) CT-NLM-GF [25], and (h) proposed denoising model with = 40 Table 1 demonstrates that the quality evaluation parameters like PSNR and SSIM for the denoising algorithms like CT [12], NLM [3], MBF [13], NLMNT [17], BM3D [19], GSRC [21], CT-NLM-GF [25] and proposed denoising model with the values ranging from 10 to 40, where our proposed model obtained the best values of both PSNR and SSIM which are highlighted in bold letter for visual convenience. However, here mean PSNR is considered instead of individual image PSNR which is further compared with conventional denoising approaches as demonstrated in Table 1.…”