2016
DOI: 10.21573/vol32n22016.63796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Custo Aluno Qualidade inicial, 10% do PIB e uma nova fonte de receita: novas perspectivas para o financiamento da educação básica?

Abstract: Resumo: O artigo apresenta as proposições, iniciativas e debates que tomaram corpo na última década no campo do financiamento da educação básica no Brasil. Combinando pesquisa documental e estatística descritiva, analisa os limites e as perspectivas desses novos arranjos para o alcance de um padrão de qualidade, em resposta ao cumprimento do direito à educação. Argumenta em favor da implantação do Custo Aluno Qualidade inicial e de uma maior participação da União para o alcance de um padrão mínimo de Qualidade… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is still a lot be done, mainly for municipal rural schools in the North and Northeast. Despite the increase in resources for education, investment is far from ideal to ensure quality cost deployment per student as stipulated in the 2014 PNE, or to reduce asymmetries in the vast national territory (CAVALCANTI, 2016). As previously pointed out, the indicators can assist in monitoring infrastructure, but funding issues go beyond the scope of our research.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is still a lot be done, mainly for municipal rural schools in the North and Northeast. Despite the increase in resources for education, investment is far from ideal to ensure quality cost deployment per student as stipulated in the 2014 PNE, or to reduce asymmetries in the vast national territory (CAVALCANTI, 2016). As previously pointed out, the indicators can assist in monitoring infrastructure, but funding issues go beyond the scope of our research.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 95%