Custom-Made Foot Orthoses as Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain and Pronated Foot Treatment

Castro-Méndez, Aurora; Palomo-Toucedo, Inmaculada C.; Pabón-Carrasco, Manuel; Ramos-Ortega, Javier; Díaz-Mancha, Juan Antonio; Fernández-Seguín, Lourdes María

doi:10.3390/ijerph18136816

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This treatment could improve symptoms of LBP through altering abnormal foot posture and in uence kinematic posture of lower limb and pelvis 39 . The application of FPI-6 is helpful to understand foot types in patients with LBP, so that appropriate foot orthoses could be used according to the different foot types 10 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Yang

Mao

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) is a valid and moderately reliable tool to evaluate foot posture. However, data about reliability and validity of FPI-6 in the assessment of foot posture in people with low back pain (LBP) is lacking.Objectives: To investigate reliability and validity of FPI-6 in the assessment of foot posture in people with LBP.Methods: Thirty volunteers with LBP, aged 20 - 64 years, were recruited for the research and assessed by two raters. The data measured by different raters on the same day were used to calculate the inter-rater reliability. The data measured by the same rater on different dates were used to calculate the test-retest reliability. The reliability of FPI-6 was tested with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability with standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland–Altman analysis. The validity of FPI-6 was tested with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Spearman's correlation coefficients. Results: The FPI-6 indicated excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability in the evaluation of foot posture in people with LBP (ICC = 0.97 and 0.95). The agreement for inter-rater and test-retest was excellent based on the SEM (SEM = 0.12) and MDC value (MDC = 0.33). Bland–Altman plots showed that there was no significant systematic bias for the agreement on the ground of low mean difference (< 1). The EFA suggested that the fit indices were considered acceptable according to the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value (KMO = 0.620) and Bartlett's sphericity test (P < 0.01). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between each item and total score of FPI-6 because the Spearman’s correlation coefficient of six items were all > 0.3 (P < 0.01).Conclusions: The inter-rater and test-retest reliability and validity of FPI-6 on people with LBP were proved reliable. It might be considered a reliable and valid adjunctive tool to detect possible changes of foot posture after interventions in patients with LBP.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Yang

Mao

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Different types of foot orthoses were used to prevent or treat LBP. This treatment could improve symptoms of LBP through altering abnormal foot posture www.nature.com/scientificreports/ and influence kinematic posture of lower limb and pelvis 39 . The application of FPI-6 is helpful to understand foot types in patients with LBP, so that appropriate foot orthoses could be used according to the different foot types 10 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Yang

Mao

et al. 2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous studies have demonstrated that Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) is a valid and moderately reliable tool to evaluate foot posture. However, data about reliability and validity of FPI-6 in the assessment of foot posture in people with low back pain (LBP) is lacking. To investigate reliability and validity of FPI-6 in the assessment of foot posture in people with LBP. Thirty volunteers with LBP, aged 20–64 years, were recruited for the research and assessed by two raters. The data measured by different raters on the same day were used to calculate the inter-rater reliability. The data measured by the same rater on different dates were used to calculate the test–retest reliability. The reliability of FPI-6 was tested with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability with standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland–Altman analysis. The validity of FPI-6 was tested with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Spearman's correlation coefficients. The FPI-6 indicated excellent inter-rater and test–retest reliability in the evaluation of foot posture in people with LBP (ICC = 0.97 and 0.95). The agreement for inter-rater and test–retest was excellent based on the SEM (SEM = 0.12) and MDC value (MDC = 0.33). Bland–Altman plots showed that there was no significant systematic bias for the agreement on the ground of low mean difference (< 1). The EFA suggested that the fit indices were considered acceptable according to the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value (KMO = 0.620) and Bartlett's sphericity test (P < 0.01). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between each item and total score of FPI-6 because the Spearman’s correlation coefficient of six items were all > 0.3 (P < 0.01). The inter-rater and test–retest reliability and validity of FPI-6 on people with LBP were proved reliable. It might be considered a reliable and valid adjunctive tool to detect possible changes of foot posture after interventions in patients with LBP.

show abstract

Effects of physical interventions on pain and disability in chronic low back pain with pronated feet: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alam,

Ansari,

Zaki

et al. 2024

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Custom-Made Foot Orthoses as Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain and Pronated Foot Treatment

Cited by 4 publications

References 35 publications

Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Reliability and validity of Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) for evaluating foot posture in participants with low back pain

Effects of physical interventions on pain and disability in chronic low back pain with pronated feet: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About