2002
DOI: 10.1108/08858620210419754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets?

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the value construct among both marketing researchers and practitioners. Despite a growing body of research, it is still not clear how value interacts with related marketing constructs. Researchers have called for an investigation of the interrelationship between customer satisfaction and customer value to reduce the ambiguities surrounding both concepts. Investigates whether customer value and satisfaction represent two theoretically and empirically d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
659
4
46

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 916 publications
(757 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
48
659
4
46
Order By: Relevance
“…In constraint-based relationships, customers exhibit a higher tendency to search for alternatives than do customers in dedication based relationships (Bendapudi & Berry, 1997). Eggert and Ulaga (2003) find a strong negative association between customer-perceived value and search for alternatives, indicating that the higher relationship value for a customer is, the less likely it is to search for alternative suppliers.…”
Section: Effects On Search For Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In constraint-based relationships, customers exhibit a higher tendency to search for alternatives than do customers in dedication based relationships (Bendapudi & Berry, 1997). Eggert and Ulaga (2003) find a strong negative association between customer-perceived value and search for alternatives, indicating that the higher relationship value for a customer is, the less likely it is to search for alternative suppliers.…”
Section: Effects On Search For Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other authors relate satisfaction to process result, in other words to the response or state of the customer considering consumption of the product. This response may be cognitive (Howard and Sheth, 1969;Churchill and Surprenant, 1982;Day, 1984), with satisfaction as the result of a consumption experience in which the consumer cognitively evaluates the variables (expectations and results, effort and reward) or satisfaction may be affective (Woodruff and Gardial, 1996;Giese and Cote, 2000;Vanhamme and Snelders, 2001;Eggert and Ulaga, 2002) and reflect the feelings of the consumer or the company (Anderson and Narus, 1984) in terms of product enjoyment. The most useful theoretical basis for explaining the process which leads to judgments of satisfaction has proved to be the disconfirmation of expectations paradigm based on evaluating or measuring certain variables, mainly the perception of the results (performance) and certain comparison standards.…”
Section: Satisfaction and Loyalty In Inter-company Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, perceived value was proven to have direct positive effect on customer satisfaction in many service industries (Eggert & Ulaga, 2002;McDougall & Levesque, 2000). Additionally, satisfaction was found to be a mediator between the perceived value and loyalty; in other words, the path "Perceived value-Satisfaction-Loyalty" was supported (Gallarza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Perceived Valuementioning
confidence: 91%