2020
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5d3f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customizable, engineered substrates for rapid screening of cellular cues

Abstract: Biophysical cues robustly direct cell responses and are thus important tools for in vitro and translational biomedical applications. High throughput platforms exploring substrates with varying physical properties are therefore valuable. However, currently existing platforms are limited in throughput, the biomaterials used, the capability to segregate between different cues and the assessment of dynamic responses. Here we present a multiwell array (3 × 8) made of a substrate engineered to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 This could be achieved with ligands such as RGDs to improve actin cytoskeletal dynamics and mechanotransduction of cellular cues and synthesis of structural proteins such as elastin, collagen or fibronectin that will improve mechanical resilience, functionality and matrix viscosity. [34][35][36] Under the current experimental conditions, the peptide nanofibrous network is too soft and viscous to facilitate F-actin nuclear contraction and surface cell mechanics due to the limited surface stiffness of the material to support the typical purse-string contraction mechanism, as previously described. 17 In contrast, recent self-assembling membrane systems were designed to promote protein conformational changes that guide assembly to form soft biomaterials or are triggered by fibronectin to form nano sized networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…33 This could be achieved with ligands such as RGDs to improve actin cytoskeletal dynamics and mechanotransduction of cellular cues and synthesis of structural proteins such as elastin, collagen or fibronectin that will improve mechanical resilience, functionality and matrix viscosity. [34][35][36] Under the current experimental conditions, the peptide nanofibrous network is too soft and viscous to facilitate F-actin nuclear contraction and surface cell mechanics due to the limited surface stiffness of the material to support the typical purse-string contraction mechanism, as previously described. 17 In contrast, recent self-assembling membrane systems were designed to promote protein conformational changes that guide assembly to form soft biomaterials or are triggered by fibronectin to form nano sized networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…248 Furthermore, high throughput platforms and multiwell arrays enable rapid screening of different cellular stimuli, such as surface exposed topography or rigidity cues, simultaneously or isolated to assess their influence on cell behavior. 249 Research on biomaterials for tissue engineering is poised to grow in the future 250 , as personalized regenerative medicine approaches using stem cells are moving towards clinical applications 251 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were allowed to differentiate in response to the nanopatterns without biochemical inducers of osteogenesis. Polystyrene patterned with the same nanopit arrays was used to study differentiation, to ensure the isolated effects of each nanopattern without confounding paracrine effects 57 . Cells were seeded onto patterned polystyrene at 5000 cells/cm 2 and allowed to grow for either 2 days or 28 days.…”
Section: Cell Functionality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%