2013
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutaneous Markers of Photo-Damage and Risk of Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Epidemiologic research has shown that cutaneous markers of photo-damage are associated with risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, there has been no previous attempt to calculate pooled risk estimates. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis after extracting relevant studies published up to January 2013 from five electronic databases. Eligible studies were those that permitted quantitative assessment of the association between histologically confirmed BCC and actinic keratoses, solar elastosis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
32
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, most SCC lesions arise from actinically damaged skin, which is an indicator of cumulative (lifetime) UVR exposure [2]. On the contrary, an association between morphologic markers of cutaneous photodamage and an increased risk of BCC has been proven to be only moderate [19].…”
Section: Kľúčové Slovámentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, most SCC lesions arise from actinically damaged skin, which is an indicator of cumulative (lifetime) UVR exposure [2]. On the contrary, an association between morphologic markers of cutaneous photodamage and an increased risk of BCC has been proven to be only moderate [19].…”
Section: Kľúčové Slovámentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Green et al [29], the relative risk of developing invasive SCC is increased by 5–6 times, if up to 20 AKs are present. The risk for developing a BCC is increased by up to 5 times if AK count exceeds 10 [7]. …”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both AK and BCC share a substantial amount of environmental and individual risk factors including ultraviolet radiation, fair skin, low ability to tan, higher age, male sex, personal or family history of skin cancer and immunosuppression [1, 3, 5, 6]. Both are markers of cutaneous photodamage and the presence of AK and BCC in a single individual is not uncommon; moreover, the presence of AK has been shown to increase the risk of BCC by approximately 3 times [7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular belief is that a crucial factor for the formation of SCC is cumulative lifetime sun exposure, while it is less important for the development of BCC, in which an intermittent solar exposure rather than chronic one may be more prejudicial etiologic determinant [1,[18][19][20]. Even association between morphologic markers of cutaneous photodamage and an increased risk of BCC has been proven only moderate [21]. As for cutaneous MM, an intermittent intense sun exposure was shown to play considerable role as risk factor, whereas a high occupational sun exposure seemed to be inversely associated to MM development [1,18,20,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%