1992
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.128.4.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Evaluation of pretreatment skin biopsy specimens by a panel of pathologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4,[6][7][8][9][10][11] The histopathologic features of early MF vary from person to person, over time, and even between multiple sites in a single patient. 12,13 In addition, Figure 1.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,[6][7][8][9][10][11] The histopathologic features of early MF vary from person to person, over time, and even between multiple sites in a single patient. 12,13 In addition, Figure 1.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,14 These difficulties are highlighted by reported false-negative and false-positive rates as high as 40%, 15 in addition to low concordance and reproducibility rates. 4,[8][9][10] Because of these diagnostic challenges in early MF, during the past decades, several authors have attempted to identify the most-reliable diagnostic criteria for distinguishing MF from benign dermatoses. 4,5,7,[10][11][12][13][14]16,17 Characteristic histopathologic features of early MF include the presence of enlarged epidermal lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei within the epidermis and minimal associated spongiosis (epidermotropism), larger lymphocytes in the epidermis than in the dermis, lymphocytes with perinuclear clearing (halo), and a linear arrangement of basilar epidermal lymphocytes along the dermal-epidermal junction (tagging) (Figure 2, B through D).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic accuracy and the reliability of conventional histopathologic features of CTCL, especially in the initial stages of the disease, have been reported to be extremely limited, even in the hands of experienced and well-trained pathologists. 8,27,28 In addition, investigations have documented that major interrater variability and intrarater variability among pathologists and dermatopathologists were common when evaluating skin biopsy specimens for the diagnosis of CTCL. 8,28 However, the real extent of the problem is not presently known, since studies dealing with the histologic diagnosis of CTCL have almost always been biased by several major problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,27,28 In addition, investigations have documented that major interrater variability and intrarater variability among pathologists and dermatopathologists were common when evaluating skin biopsy specimens for the diagnosis of CTCL. 8,28 However, the real extent of the problem is not presently known, since studies dealing with the histologic diagnosis of CTCL have almost always been biased by several major problems. First, the real nature of the diseases featured in the slides was not determined-in fact, study cases did not generally have longterm follow-up data documenting the progression of the diseases or death of the patient caused by the diseases, leaving doubt as to the neoplastic nature of the lymphoproliferative disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sie finden sich allerdings nur bei einer kleineren Zahl von Mycosis fungoides-Fällen und sind daher nicht sensitiv [11]. Als weiterer erschwerender Faktor bei der histopathologischen Begutachtung früher Mycosis fungoides-Läsionen kommt die intra-und interindividuelle Variabilität der begutachtenden Dermatopathologen hinzu [12].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified