2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40323-018-0099-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CutIGA with basis function removal

Abstract: We consider a cut isogeometric method, where the boundary of the domain is allowed to cut through the background mesh in an arbitrary fashion for a second order elliptic model problem. In order to stabilize the method on the cut boundary we remove basis functions which have small intersection with the computational domain. We determine criteria on the intersection which guarantee that the order of convergence in the energy norm is not affected by the removal. The higher order regularity of the B-spline basis f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible alternatives to the diagonal scaling preconditioning are the ghost penalty techniques [14,15]; the use of additive Schwarz preconditioners as proposed in [19,32] for finite cell and isogeometric discretizations, and extended in [20] to case of immersed IGA combined with multigrid methods; or the stable removal of basis functions, as proposed in [24] in the context of CutIGA methods.…”
Section: Linear System Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible alternatives to the diagonal scaling preconditioning are the ghost penalty techniques [14,15]; the use of additive Schwarz preconditioners as proposed in [19,32] for finite cell and isogeometric discretizations, and extended in [20] to case of immersed IGA combined with multigrid methods; or the stable removal of basis functions, as proposed in [24] in the context of CutIGA methods.…”
Section: Linear System Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote by V x any of the FE spaces V std , or V agg , when it is not necessary to distinguish between them. We approximate problem (8) in V x with the following variational equation:…”
Section: Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a positive definite stiffness matrix we apply basis function removal. This approach was analyzed in [10] and builds on the the idea of systematically removing basis functions that have sufficiently small intersection with the domain. This is done in such a way that optimal order accuracy in a specified norm is retained.…”
Section: Basis Function Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first alternative rests on a complete theoretical basis; the second is common in practice but optimal order a priori bounds can not be established in general since the penalty parameter may become very large, see the discussion in [7]; and the third alternative was considered in [10] where a least squares term was added in the vicinity of the Dirichlet part of the boundary to provide the additional stability necessary to establish a priori error bounds. We refer to the overview article [5], and the recent conference proceedings [3] for an overview of current research on cut element methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation