1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(99)00050-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycles in competitive electricity markets: a simulation study of the western United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, if the market does not clear, it may be necessary to institute a price cap to protect consumers against overcharging (e.g., Ford, 1999;Hobbs et al, 2001c;Stoft, 2002). If consumers are not involved in real-time price setting, they may otherwise find themselves paying more for electricity than their value of lost load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, if the market does not clear, it may be necessary to institute a price cap to protect consumers against overcharging (e.g., Ford, 1999;Hobbs et al, 2001c;Stoft, 2002). If consumers are not involved in real-time price setting, they may otherwise find themselves paying more for electricity than their value of lost load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating modelling alternatives for policy support, the literature provides foundations to carry it out using simulation and system dynamics. On the one hand, Bunn and Dyner (1996), Larsen and Bunn (1999), Ford (1999) and Dyner (2000) state that system dynamics may be a sensible option, especially if operating under rapidly evolving systems or under recently restructured markets. Furthermore, Morecroft (1983) argues that system dynamics implicitly uses bounded rationality frameworks, and that the behaviour of complex organizations can only be understood by taking into account the knowledge of individuals and their psychological limitations.…”
Section: Modelling Consumers' Decision Making In Electricity Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conceptualize sophisticated environmental -economic interactions with robust capability, SD has been employed in environmental systems (Deaton and Winebrake 1997;Ford 1999b;Chang et al 2008;Muneepeerakul and Qubbaj 2012) modeling SD (Forrester 1971;Meadows et al 1992; Van den Bergh and Nijkamp 1994;Saeed and Radzicki 1998;Jin et al 2009), ecological modeling (Costanza and Gottlieb 1998;Costanza and Voinov 2001;Arquitt and Johnstone 2008;Huang et al 2008), energy planning (Ford 1999a(Ford , 1999bJin et al 2009), sustainable supply chain management (Seuring and Müller 2008a), sustainability assessment (Krajnc and GlaviÄ 2005;Shmelev 2011;Van Zeijl-Rozema and Ferraguto 2011), and urban environmental sustainability (Yu and Wen 2010;Ianos et al 2012). Uncertainty and ambiguity still exist in expert responses (Hwang and Lin, 1987;Chang et al 2000;Shen et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%