2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic deformation behavior of a Ti–26 at.% Nb alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So from tensile test results, it is concluded that Ti-6Cr-3Sn developed alloy was in metastable state and excellent ductility was due to transformation of metastable phase to stress induced martensite and due to twinning deformation mode during mechanical loading. 18) Vickers hardness test results are given in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So from tensile test results, it is concluded that Ti-6Cr-3Sn developed alloy was in metastable state and excellent ductility was due to transformation of metastable phase to stress induced martensite and due to twinning deformation mode during mechanical loading. 18) Vickers hardness test results are given in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the reverse transformation from 00 (orthorhombic) phase to the phase causes shape recovery to appear. [17][18][19] Ti-Cr is also hopeful alloy system for biomedical applications and there are some reports on mechanical properties of Ti-Cr 20,21) and Ti-Cr-X alloys. [22][23][24][25] Selection of Ti-Cr-Sn alloy system was due to phase stabilizing effect of Cr, low melting points of Cr and Sn as compared to other phase stabilizing elements and solid solution strengthening effect of Cr and Sn (atomic radius: Cr ¼ 0:126 nm, Sn ¼ 0:158 nm, Ti ¼ 0:146 nm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, further microstructural analyzes, such as transmission electron microscopy have to be done to confirm that explanation. It is also noticed from Figure 4 that no peak related to the martensitic phase was detected by the XRD analyzes, which suggests that either the number of cycles or the strain amplitude used in the training were not enough to stabilize martensite [14,29,30]. …”
Section: * Technical Contribution To the 71º Congresso Anual Da Abm -mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Al-Zain et al and Tahara et al performed in situ X-ray diffraction studies on Ti-26Nb and Ti-13Nb-4Mo alloys (at%) and detected the SIM α″ phase transformation [144,145]. The α″ phase is shown to be formed from 0.2% to 2.5% of strain and to be partially reversible after unloading from 2.5% strain [144][145][146]. These experiments were performed using a deformation of 2.5% which was followed by unloading.…”
Section: Identification Of α″ Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous work tried to stabilise SIM α″ by cyclic deformation and severe deformation [38,146,190]. It has been accepted that the stabilisation is due to the interruption of the reverse martensitic transformation by dislocations introduced during prior plastic deformation.…”
Section: Twinning Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%