1999
DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1998.7787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Extensions of Free Pro-p Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note also that the second countability condition is essential: for bigger cardinality the result is not true, a counter example is available in [7,Section 4]. We use notation for profinite and pro-p groups from [9].…”
Section: • the Module U N Of N -Fixed Points Is A Free Z P [G/n ]-Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note also that the second countability condition is essential: for bigger cardinality the result is not true, a counter example is available in [7,Section 4]. We use notation for profinite and pro-p groups from [9].…”
Section: • the Module U N Of N -Fixed Points Is A Free Z P [G/n ]-Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proof, we use essentially Theorem 2.2 in Herfort-Zalesskii [5], which describes certain free-by-cyclic pro-p groups as a free pro-p product of normalizers of subgroups of order p and some additional free factor. If n = 1 then we use Theorem A to prove that the abelianization…”
Section: Theorem a Let C = X Be A Group Of Order P And Let M Be A Z mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this not much is known about Aut(F n ), for example, it is not clear whether the virtual cohomological dimension of Aut(F n ) is finite. Certain progress however has been made in [4] and [5] towards understanding finite p-subgroups of Aut(F n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let H be a cyclic group of order p r and let ρ : H → GL n (Z p ) be a representation. Then ρ lifts if and only if the Z p H-module M associated to ρ is a direct sum of indecomposable Z p H-modules which are isomorphic either to Z p C p k for some 0 ≤ k ≤ r or to J C p m (C p k ) for some 0 ≤ m < k ≤ r. The proofs of Theorem A and B are constructive in the sense that we give an explicit lifting φ : H → Aut(F n ) in terms of the semidirect product F n φ H. We use the result of [5] describing free-by-cyclic pro-p groups and a free decomposition of [4] for free-by-finite pro-p groups having finite centralizers of torsion elements. The representations in both theorems above are not necessarily faithful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%