1993
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(93)90560-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclotron 82Sr production for medical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many solid target systems for cyclotrons have been described earlier in the literature and examples of such systems can be found within the Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Lebeda et al, 2005;Thisgaard et al, 2011), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research (Čomor et al, 2004;Steyn et al, 2013;Vereshchagin et al, 1993) and the International Workshop on Targetry and Target Chemistry proceedings (Avila-Rodriques et al, 2006;Gelbart et al, 2012). Solid target systems can be categorized by beam power deposited in their targets; small scale ≈ 0.1 kW, medium scale ≈ 1 kW and large scale >1 kW targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many solid target systems for cyclotrons have been described earlier in the literature and examples of such systems can be found within the Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Lebeda et al, 2005;Thisgaard et al, 2011), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research (Čomor et al, 2004;Steyn et al, 2013;Vereshchagin et al, 1993) and the International Workshop on Targetry and Target Chemistry proceedings (Avila-Rodriques et al, 2006;Gelbart et al, 2012). Solid target systems can be categorized by beam power deposited in their targets; small scale ≈ 0.1 kW, medium scale ≈ 1 kW and large scale >1 kW targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process from past to present, many studies have been carried out on the production of 82 Sr by different nuclear reaction channels. For example, one of the proton bombardment studies, such as the 85 Rb(p,4n) 82 Sr reaction [7,8], has been done by Kastleiner et al in 2001. In the experimental study using the stacked foil technique, the margin of error has been calculated as 13-26% and best reaction cross section value obtained has been determined as 195 mb at 45 MeV [9]. Another study has been conducted by Buthelezi et al in 2006 [10] for the nat Rb(p,xn) 82 Sr [10,11] reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the indicated reactions, 82 Sr can be obtained by irradiating gaseous krypton targets with 3 He or 4 He in cyclotrons, which are relatively inexpensive to operate, with average energy (E α, 3 He ≤ 60-70 MeV) [5,6]. The highest yield of 82 Sr in this method can be attained with a cascade target, consisting of modules highly enriched with krypton isotopes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These generators are compact, can be easily delivered to a clinic, including over large distances, and have a long service life. In addition, there is no need to have and operate a cyclotron in a clinic.At the present time, 82 Sr is obtained in the reactions Mo(p, spallation) and Rb(p, xn) in unique expensive high-energy (E p~ 100-800 MeV) accelerators which are intended for fundamental research [1][2][3][4]. Aside from the indicated reactions, 82 Sr can be obtained by irradiating gaseous krypton targets with 3 He or 4 He in cyclotrons, which are relatively inexpensive to operate, with average energy (E α, 3 He ≤ 60-70 MeV) [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%