2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cylindrical porous radiant burner with internal combustion regime: Energy saving analysis using response surface method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that tests can be experiments or simulations. [21][22][23] In this work, numerical simulation is used as a test to verify the reliability of the RSM model and the accuracy of the prediction results.…”
Section: Bluff-body Size Optimization Based On Response Surface Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that tests can be experiments or simulations. [21][22][23] In this work, numerical simulation is used as a test to verify the reliability of the RSM model and the accuracy of the prediction results.…”
Section: Bluff-body Size Optimization Based On Response Surface Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of previous works have been done on the application of the response surface method (RSM) in scientific research. Vahidhosseini et al [ 21 ] performed a RSM analysis on a cylindrical porous radiant burner with internal combustion regime. Three dependent variables of the output enthalpy, radiant efficiency, and radiative heat were investigated by the verified model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the porous burner is made of foam or pellets/beads in the above literature survey, new designs are proposed such as a porous radiant burner where the combustion takes place within a volume confined by a porous structure having a high pore density (porosity close to 65% and 30-70 pores per inch (PPI)) [24e26]. This approach, named internal combustion regime (ICR), is said to offer radiant efficiency greater than 50% without mixture preheat [24]. Other recent approaches based on the idea of using tailored porous structures has recently emerged as a potential application to CPM [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%