2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic comparisons between A and G genomes in Oryza using genomic in situ hybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the evolutionary long term, there have arisen different degrees of genetic differences among the various genomes and even different chromosomes within the same genome of the genus Oryza, and the GISH method has been widely used to study this differentiation and the resulting relationships [26][27][28][29] . In the present study, a two-step in situ hybridization procedure including GISH and FISH was used to discriminate among the A, C, and D genomes in the interspecific hybrid between O. sativa and O. latifolia and to investigate chromosome pairing at meiotic metaphase I in the pollen mother cells of the hybrid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the evolutionary long term, there have arisen different degrees of genetic differences among the various genomes and even different chromosomes within the same genome of the genus Oryza, and the GISH method has been widely used to study this differentiation and the resulting relationships [26][27][28][29] . In the present study, a two-step in situ hybridization procedure including GISH and FISH was used to discriminate among the A, C, and D genomes in the interspecific hybrid between O. sativa and O. latifolia and to investigate chromosome pairing at meiotic metaphase I in the pollen mother cells of the hybrid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the crossability of the hybrid between O. sativa and O. latifolia was 0-4.89%. However, with the development of embryo rescue techniques, an increasing number of interspecific hybrids between O. sativa and wild rice species with different genomes has been produced, including O. latifolia (CCDD genome) [19] , O. minuta (BBCC genome) [20] , O. eichingeri (CC genome) [13] , O. officinalis (CC genome) [10,21] , O. australiensis (EE genome) [22,23] , O. brachyantha (FF genome) [24] , O. ridleyi (HHJJ genome) [25] , and O. meyeriana (GG genome) [26] . The obtained interspecific hybrids offer an opportunity to transfer useful genes from wild rice species to commercially cultivated varieties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simultaneous addition of more than one probe to the hybridization mix is called the multicolor GISH (mGISH) technique (Li et al, 2001a,b;Xiong et al, 2006). Even at low stringency levels, mGISH showed good resolution in the karyotypic characterization of species of complex genomic constitution, such as allotetraploids (Li et al, 2001a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on MI cells but some reports on the extent of synapsis at the pachytene stage can also be found (Xiong et al, 2006). Traditional dyes or modern equivalents like DAPI are the easiest and less time-consuming tools for the purpose when both parental species are diploids because the chromosomes in the hybrid have only the choice of allosyndetic (crop-wild) pairing.…”
Section: Potential Of Crop-to-wild Genetic Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinopyrum bessarabicum hybrids (King et al, 1993). Nowadays, this cytomolecular tool has become the most extended method for MI pairing analyses of interspecific hybrids not only from wheat (e.g., Benavente et al, 1998;Jauhar et al, 2004) but from many other crop species as distinct as tomato (Ji and Chetelat, 2003), onion (Stevenson et al, 1998), barley (Zhang et al, 1999), maize (Gonzalez et al, 2006), dahlia (Gatt et al, 2000), lily (Lim et al, 2001), rice (Xiong et al, 2006) and several brassicas (Wang et al, 2004;Wei et al, 2006), among others ( Figs. 4, 8).…”
Section: Potential Of Crop-to-wild Genetic Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%