2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470515006.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Effects as Quantitative Indicators of Radiation Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on atomic bomb survivors showed elevated chromosome aberration rates in the exposed individuals that had persisted for at least two decades after the acute external exposures to thousands of individuals in 1945 [ 4 – 7 ]. The persistent cytogenetic effects were also reported in Chernobyl accident victims in 1986 [ 8 ] as well as in the nuclear industry workers in the USA with accidental exposures to plutonium [ 9 11 ]. Although persistence of chromosomal aberrations has been reported in persons exposed to high-dose radiation, studies on long-term monitoring of cytogenetic damage following exposure to low doses of medical/diagnostic radiation exposure are very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Studies on atomic bomb survivors showed elevated chromosome aberration rates in the exposed individuals that had persisted for at least two decades after the acute external exposures to thousands of individuals in 1945 [ 4 – 7 ]. The persistent cytogenetic effects were also reported in Chernobyl accident victims in 1986 [ 8 ] as well as in the nuclear industry workers in the USA with accidental exposures to plutonium [ 9 11 ]. Although persistence of chromosomal aberrations has been reported in persons exposed to high-dose radiation, studies on long-term monitoring of cytogenetic damage following exposure to low doses of medical/diagnostic radiation exposure are very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The analysis of stable aberrations has generally been performed by chromosome banding, which is a labor-intensive method. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosomespecific composite DNA probes, known as chromosome painting, can be used to detect stable aberrations quickly and accurately [Cremer et al, 1988;Lucas et al, 1989Lucas et al, , 1992Natarajan et al, 1992;Lucas and Sachs, 1993;Tucker et al, 1995;Bauchinger, 1997;Robinson, 1998;Bauchinger et al, 2001;Lindholm, 2001]. In fact, exchanges between painted and unpainted (counterstained) chromosomes appear as bicolored chromosomes, making visualization of aberrations, such as translocations, easier and faster than by conventional staining techniques, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the assay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%