2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00320-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic effects of hexavalent chromium in Bulgarian chromium platers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cytogenetic damage in exposed humans has been reported by many authors and most of the published reports are restricted to occupational exposures to ionizing radiation (Maluf 2004), heavy metals (Benova et al 2002;Clemens and Landolph 2003;Wise et al 2003), and PCBs (Kalina et al 1991;Joksić and Marković 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cytogenetic damage in exposed humans has been reported by many authors and most of the published reports are restricted to occupational exposures to ionizing radiation (Maluf 2004), heavy metals (Benova et al 2002;Clemens and Landolph 2003;Wise et al 2003), and PCBs (Kalina et al 1991;Joksić and Marković 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy metals are cytotoxic, genotoxic and carcinogenic. Benova et al (2002) studied the cytogenetic and molecular effects of Cr(VI) on peripheral lymphocytes and exfoliated buccal cells employing a chromosomal aberration assay, sister-chromatid exchanges and micronucleus test. The data obtained from exposed works showed a significant increase in the number of cells with MN in lymphocytes as well as in the buccal cells.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Lymphocyte Micronuclei Amongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cr and Cr compounds have been tested for genotoxicity in a variety of short-term tests using different end-points [28,29,16]. Moreover, there are reports on positive genotoxic effects in populations exposed to Cr [9,30,25,3,11]. Workers occupationally exposed to Cr are considered to be at an elevated risk for developing cancer [27,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data have been strongly supported by studies confirming that the target of ROS is DNA with possible strand breaks or mutation in addition to the alteration in transcription activities [34] . However, in another study, no significant difference was observed between exposed and controls workers exposed to chromium with regard to the frequency of peripheral lymphocytes with chromosome aberrations [35] . Nowadays, DNA-protein cross-links are considered a promising biomarker signaling an exposure of body tissues to biologically active forms of chromium [36] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%