2013
DOI: 10.1159/000353118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Nomenclature: Changes in the ISCN 2013 Compared to the 2009 Edition

Abstract: The latest edition of the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, ISCN 2013, has recently been published following a thorough revision of the 2009 issue and the incorporation of suggestions from the community by the current standing committee. This review will highlight the multiple nomenclature changes in the respective chapters of the 2013 version compared to the previous version of the ISCN published in 2009. These highlights are meant as a guide for the cytogeneticist to assist in the tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
167
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
167
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the disparity in techniques from which genetic data are obtained, all the curated genetic test result information was manually reviewed to extract the coordinates and genome assembly of the chromosomal abnormalities. Chromosomal coordinates for CGH were extracted from the relevant structured fields (chromosome, gain/loss, start, end), and from the International Society of Cytogenetics Nomenclature (ISCN 2013) standard (Simons, Shaffer, & Hastings, 2013) and comments where necessary. Chromosomal coordinates for FISH results were directly obtained in the GRCh38/hg38 genome assembly (Miga et al, 2014) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Clone database (Schneider et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the disparity in techniques from which genetic data are obtained, all the curated genetic test result information was manually reviewed to extract the coordinates and genome assembly of the chromosomal abnormalities. Chromosomal coordinates for CGH were extracted from the relevant structured fields (chromosome, gain/loss, start, end), and from the International Society of Cytogenetics Nomenclature (ISCN 2013) standard (Simons, Shaffer, & Hastings, 2013) and comments where necessary. Chromosomal coordinates for FISH results were directly obtained in the GRCh38/hg38 genome assembly (Miga et al, 2014) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Clone database (Schneider et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slides were rinsed with water and air-dried. The karyotypes were expressed according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature 2013 (14).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…исследованных членов ее семьи arr (1-22, X)×2, что соответствует нормальному женскому кариотипу [41]. Был выявлен ряд вариаций числа копий (CNVcopy number variation) сегментов ДНК размером от 1000 п.н., отличающихся от референсного генома (уменьшение -делеция или увеличение -дуплика-ция копийности) (рис.…”
Section: синдромunclassified