2007
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.4230.4235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Studies on Nine Genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Cultivated in Egypt in Relation to Zinc Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Castagnaro et al (1990) reported that the genome size of the wild common bean was 1.71 pg2C -1 , whereas the cultivated common bean had different values, such as 1.56, 1.63, 1.69, and 1.79 pg2C -1 . In another study involving 9 accessions, it was reported that the genome size of the common bean varied between 2.65 and 4.96 pg2C -1 (Mekki et al, 2007). It was clear that the results obtained from the current study were similar to some of the previous studies, while different from others.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Castagnaro et al (1990) reported that the genome size of the wild common bean was 1.71 pg2C -1 , whereas the cultivated common bean had different values, such as 1.56, 1.63, 1.69, and 1.79 pg2C -1 . In another study involving 9 accessions, it was reported that the genome size of the common bean varied between 2.65 and 4.96 pg2C -1 (Mekki et al, 2007). It was clear that the results obtained from the current study were similar to some of the previous studies, while different from others.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Today, the flow cytometry method is used to determine genome size; however, the genetic resources of the common bean have not been examined in detail using the flow cytometry method (FCM). To date, a very limited number of studies have been conducted, in which only a few common bean accessions coexisted or were analyzed with other species (Ayonoadu, 1974;Bennet et al, 1982;Castagnaro et al, 1990;Arumuganathan and Earle, 1991;Beletti et al, 1997;Mekki et al, 2007;Labotan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosome number in all genotypes was 2n = 2x = 22, confirming several previous results [17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][27][28][29][30]. The MTCL (Mean Total Chromosome Length) recorded in the studied genotypes varied from 15.65 ± 0.99 to 34.24 ± 0.35 micrometers (Table 2), which is almost similar to the previous study on nine genotypes of the common bean, who's MTCL was measured to be between 13.74 and 29.50 micrometers [24]. In another study on bean karyotype analysis, the MCI (Mean Centromere Index) ranged between 42 and 48, which is very similar to our results (43.18 ± 0.99 to 46.83 ± 3.52) (Table 2) [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In another study on bean karyotype analysis, the MCI (Mean Centromere Index) ranged between 42 and 48, which is very similar to our results (43.18 ± 0.99 to 46.83 ± 3.52) (Table 2) [39]. The MAR (Mean Arm Ratio) was calculated to be between 1.14 ± 0.10 and 1.36 ± 0.07 (Table 2) in this study, which does not correspond to previous results (3.50 ± 0.36 to 4.30 ± 0.35) [24]. The mean genome size of the common bean accessions varied between 1.49 ± 0.032 pg in the E.L. genotype and 3.28 ± 0.101 pg in the B.T.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation