1982
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.47.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetics of Clitoria. I. Induced autotetraploidy in C. ternatea.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatments with higher concentrations and longer durations proved to be deleterious. Similar results were reported by Srivastav and Raina (1982). Out of these 11 autotetraploid plants, only 4 plants could survive up to maturity.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Treatments with higher concentrations and longer durations proved to be deleterious. Similar results were reported by Srivastav and Raina (1982). Out of these 11 autotetraploid plants, only 4 plants could survive up to maturity.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…According to Kostaff (1940), large size of the chromosomes have direct bearing on multivalent frequency. However, Morrison and Rajhathy (1960a) and Srivastav and Raina (1982) suggested that multivalent frequency in autotetraploids was largely dependent on short size of chromosomes. Present studies indicate that apart from chromosome size, other factors such as chiasma frequency which is under genetic control, heterozygous nature of plants, environmental conditions etc., might also be responsible for multivalent formation (Riley and Chapman 1958).…”
Section: Cytological Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The induced colchitetraploids showed all the characteristics features of induced polyploidy. A slower rate of growth and development was pronounced at the early stages of colchitetraploid plants and this observation is supported by earlier reports (Srivastav and Raina 1982, 1987, Dibyendu 2010, Dar et al 2017, Verma et al 2017. This reduced rate of growth and development at the initial stage could be because of a reduced rate of mitotic cell division (Eigsti 1947), a lesser quantity of growth hormone (Avery and Pottorf 1945), or a slower rate of physiological and biochemical processes (Chen and Tang 1945).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, reduction in the height of the plant, number of branches, internodal distance and number of stomata per unit area indicates that the duplication of gene does not always increase in size but may also reduce it (Singh andRoy 1971, Srivastav andRaina 1982). While considering morphological effects in induced tetraploids it is often stated that one of the chief attributes of polyploidy is gigantism (Sastry et al 1968, Das et al 1970, Alekperova 1979.…”
Section: Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%