1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79316-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoplasmic viscosity near the cell plasma membrane: translational diffusion of a small fluorescent solute measured by total internal reflection-fluorescence photobleaching recovery

Abstract: Total internal reflection-fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (TIR-FRAP) was applied to measure solute translational diffusion in the aqueous phase of membrane-adjacent cytoplasm. TIR fluorescence excitation in aqueous solutions and fluorescently labeled cells was produced by laser illumination at a subcritical angle utilizing a quartz prism; microsecond-resolution FRAP was accomplished by acousto-optic modulators and electronic photomultiplier gating. A mathematical model was developed to determine sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in the steady-state deprotonated-to-protonated SNARF-1 ratio may be due to actual pH cyt differences, variations in regional cytoplasmic microviscosity (28, 43,55,66), or even a different proportion of dye bound to cytoplasmic proteins (4). To properly interpret the differences in SNARF-1 protonated-to-deprotonated ratios, we have taken into account the behavior of the pH fluoroprobe in the cytoplasm, because it is heterogeneous in terms of composition and organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation in the steady-state deprotonated-to-protonated SNARF-1 ratio may be due to actual pH cyt differences, variations in regional cytoplasmic microviscosity (28, 43,55,66), or even a different proportion of dye bound to cytoplasmic proteins (4). To properly interpret the differences in SNARF-1 protonated-to-deprotonated ratios, we have taken into account the behavior of the pH fluoroprobe in the cytoplasm, because it is heterogeneous in terms of composition and organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differences in the cytoplasmic microenvironment in terms of protein composition and viscosity could cause distinct diffusion mobility of fluorescent probes and distinct spectral properties. Indeed, studies by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching have shown that the translational diffusion of intracellular 2Ј,7Ј-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein near the membrane and in the bulk cytoplasm is 6 -10 times and ϳ4 times lower than in water, respectively (55). However, the fluid-phase cytoplasmic viscosity in the absence of collisions or binding to cytoplasmic macromolecules is similar to the viscosity of water (26, 55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, glucocorticoid receptor mobility significantly decreases upon ligand binding (42). Interaction with cytoskeletal components can also limit a protein's ability to diffuse (19,46). Analysis of protein mobility provides important insights into biochemical processes in the context of live cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the intracellular components form a filamentous meshwork, which restricts diffusion as a cytosolic sieve. 22,23 Moreover, the GNPs tend to aggregate upon cellular uptake. 24 The aggregation of GNPs increases particles' effective diameters and thereby slows down their diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%